• RecallMadness@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Houses are pretty terrible for a multitude of factors:

    • urban sprawl
    • congestion
    • pollution
    • high cost public works
    • low income for public bodies doing those works
    • environmental erosion
    • flood protection

    We should be building apartments that everyone can own, live and be happy in. It shouldn’t be reserved for home owners.

    • TheDarkKnight@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Houses are pretty great for a few factors

      • Not sharing a wall with a neighbor
      • being able to be louder in general
      • Not being woken up by neighbors
      • Not getting your home infested with bugs because of having a nasty neighbor
      • No loud honking at night
      • Not having your door accidentally knocked on to ask if your apartment neighbor is home when they’re not answering their door
      • Parking in your own garage
      • Having a yard for your dog/kids to play in

      Apartments fucking suck in so many ways. I get that they’re pretty handy in City Skylines where everyone bases their urban planning experience from but there is a reason people prefer to live in house and it’s because it gives you separation from other people in a way apartments cannot.

      • RecallMadness@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Literally the first image in that page is a picture of Singapores public housing, and a claim that they have the highest home ownership rates in the world.

        It’s nearly as if public housing can work?

        • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Public housing can work but not without addressing poverty. Using Singapore, which has the death penalty for drug use isn’t comparable.

          Otherwise it only makes it worse by concentrating poverty into a ghetto.

          • daltotron@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            Using Singapore, which has the death penalty for drug use isn’t comparable.

            I need you to draw a clear through line to why that’s related to public housing policy in any given country.

            I’m also gonna like, cite the soviet bloc style apartments, or china’s rapid urbanization in around the same time period that the US decided to make public housing be a thing. I know for the soviet lunchboxes, you had your standard complaints of, oh, long wait lists, subpar build quality, yadda yadda, and then of course towards the beginning of the program you had a large issue with people who had previously been unindustrialized farmers basically just not knowing how to live in an apartment, shit like having your pigs stay indoors and stuff like that. I think similar issues were/are probably a part of chinese publicly subsidized housing complexes. I think barcelona’s superblocks are also publicly subsidized but I don’t know to what extent, and they seem to be working out pretty good. Now those are all places that provide publicly subsidized housing and have provided it to those who were pretty impoverished at the time. They also had/have (again idk barcelona don’t even know why I brought it up) work programs and shit, which we used to have in america, so that might contribute to your point more, but I still think, you know, it is bad to let the perfect be the enemy of the good. The projects were majorly flawed, but they are probably preferable to the whole like. rust belt suburban crime shit. I dunno, realistically it doesn’t really matter what context an apartheid ghetto scenario is happening in, because it’s going to have basically the same consequences on everyone involved.

            • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              I need you to draw a clear through line to why that’s related to public housing policy in any given country.

              Drug use is rampant among the poor because it provides escape for some and profit for others. But it is destructive to communities creating greater poverty.

              Singapore has draconian crime laws where you will be whipped for graffiti and executed for drug use. It creates a safer culture but at what cost?