• UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    98
    ·
    3 months ago

    I love how people are complaining about Wayland not being ready or being unstable (whatever that even means, because it’s a protocol), while it’s the default on both GNOME and Plasma now, which combined probably run on more than 50% of Linux desktops these days.

    And not only that, but Cinnamon, Xfce and others want to follow, so very clearly people who know a fair bit about desktops seem to disagree with Wayland being “not ready”.

    • Matty_r@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      52
      ·
      3 months ago

      When people say its not ready, it’s normally some specific use case that worked in X11. So, they’re not wrong, but not right either.

      • zurohki@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        3 months ago

        The devs have been working hard to hammer out those troublesome edge cases. There’s a lot less of them than there was a year or two ago.

    • Toribor@corndog.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      3 months ago

      Wayland was subject to “first mover disadvantage” for a long time. Why be the first to switch and have to solve all the problems? Instead be last and everyone else will do the hard work for you.

      But without big players moving to it those issues never get fixed. And users rightly should not be forced to migrate to a broken system that isn’t ready. People just want a system that works right?

      Eventually someone had to decide it was ‘good enough’ and try an industry wide push to move away from a hybrid approach that wastes developer time and confuses users.

    • njordomir@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      The change was 95% unnoticed for me. I looked at the session one day and thought “oh yeah, I have been using Wayland”. I don’t mess with many games or AI GPU stuff though, so it may be that more complex use cases result in a worse experience.

    • utopiah@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Ironically enough just 2 days ago I posted this https://lemmy.ml/post/20691536/13906950 namely how the 1st thing I do after installing NVIDIA drivers on Debian is disabling Wayland to rely on X11 simply because it doesn’t work.

      Sadly that’s relevant here precisely because if we are talking about Valve it’s about gaming, if it’s about gaming one simply can’t ignore the state of NVIDIA drivers.

      So… it might run on 50% on Linux desktops but on mine, which I also game on, it never worked once I had drivers for gaming installed. Consequently I understand “how people are complaining” because that’s exactly my experience.

      • tekato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        That’s NVIDIA’s fault for refusing to adopt the agreed upon methods for rendering graphics on Linux. They tried to force EGLStreams on everybody for almost a decade while knowing GBM was better.