• Sybil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    it is. since you seem opposed to learning anywhere but Lemmy, I’ll help you out. equivocation is an informal fallacy where you use one word in a certain context with a particular meaning, and then you use the same word in a different context with a different meaning, and then you claim that they’re the same thing. The authority of the boot maker is different from the authority of the cop. The authority of the doctor is different from the authority of the insurance company.

    • brain_in_a_box@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      it is. since you seem opposed to learning anywhere but Lemmy, I’ll help you out. equivocation is an informal fallacy where you use one word in a certain context with a particular meaning, and then you use the same word in a different context with a different meaning, and then you claim that they’re the same thing.

      Oh my God, go back to Reddit you insufferable debate bro.

          • Sybil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            don’t be intellectually dishonest, and i won’t call out your intellectual dishonesty. it’s not debate bro shit.

                  • Sybil@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    i have been expressing my earnest feelings and doing my best to convey them to you. explaining your equivocation was no more debate bro than explaining the definition of communism is. please look back through here, and you’ll find that i’m quite happy to admit i don’t really know everything, i don’t have a perfect plan for every thing, and i don’t care to argue about any of it. i don’t mind discussing, but your accusation of debate bro-ing seems, to me, like projection.