• technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Apart from their complete support for genocide and especially zionism, I think the media was likely under orders to bury the terrorist attack in order to avoid a panic. People in the imperial core don’t want to think about how they could be terrorized by their phones, cars, planes, etc. in a similar way. They just to hear about how zios slammed some “terrorists”.

    • Southern Boy@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yes considering how open most people are to device-based security paranoia you would think the fact they could have done this to westerners and blamed a terrorist organization wouldn’t sit well with people. Is it only nuclear war and hacking people are trained to fear?

      • Pilferjinx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’m saving all my gripes with kamala after the election… Trump and the Christofascists with the daggers in his back are extremely dangerous.

          • Pilferjinx@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 month ago

            You have 2 choices. Both are awful, one, however, is slightly less awful. Politicians are allowed to lie and not deliver on platform promises. Pressing kamala for words right now is meaningless. Protests after she is elected will be a lot easier and effective than a Trump administration.

            • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 month ago

              Actually you and I have a third choice called not voting for either. You are under no obligation to vote for or support a genocide. You can, in fact, spend your efforts opposing it rather than carrying water for its perpetrators.

              And I am not sure who told you that you have more leverage after elections rather than before, but they have no idea how leverage works or what building power looks like. But really, this is obviously not about strategy or organizing, but about how to justify yet again announcing support for the status quo - genocide edition.

              Please actually oppose genocide instead of making excuses for it.

            • Fidel_Cashflow@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Protests after she is elected will be a lot easier and effective than a Trump administration.

              wrong, when Good Team is in the white house, libs tend to turn off and not show up to protests/organize/etc because Good Team already won. when Bad Team gets in they at least pretend to care. a recent example you can look at is 2020, when trump was in office people were protesting police brutality, state repression etc. after 2020, not a peep, and more commonly active derision for protests.

              • Pilferjinx@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                Wait… you want Trump to win? Is this an acceleration stance? I don’t see how a far left movement can succeed in the turmoil.

                • Fidel_Cashflow@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  No, nowhere in my post did I say I want trump to win. i said it’s easier to organize when libs pretend to care about issues, instead of being actively detrimental to organizing efforts.