• TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Things like this won’t happen when Trump dissolves the Dept. of Education and the thousands of IEP’s (Individualized Education Program’s) lose funding.

    • Belgdore@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Just to clarify IEP is individual education plan. The programs are not usually separate from the schools. The DoE does provide funding based on the number of kids with IEPs to schools and districts.

      In other words kids will still be arrested for being autistic. They just won’t have as good of an education.

  • 2ugly2live@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 days ago

    When Ty’s mom got the phone call that her son was going to be arrested, she said it was her worst fear come true: Her son’s autism was mistaken for a threat. “Once you looked at his backpack, if there was nothing in there to hurt anyone, then why did you handcuff my 13-year-old autistic son who didn’t understand what was going on and take him down to juvenile?” she said.

    Why indeed.

  • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 days ago

    “we’re trying to stop the people who should know better from doing this, and if they do it, they should have more than a slap on the wrist.”

    They’re 13 years old ffs, they can’t be expected to not say stupid things.

    “I don’t know whose level of trauma is going to be the greatest: the kids in the classroom wondering if there’s an active shooter roaming their halls or a kid that didn’t know better and says something like that and gets arrested,

    Or the trauma of the kids who saw a classmate arrested for having a bunny plushie in his bag.

    In the first six weeks of the school year, 18 kids were arrested for making threats of mass violence.

    Sweet Jesus! What the fuck are you doing Tennessee?? This is madness!

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      Oh, basically the moment I’ve learned that many school shooters are autistic and I’m likely autistic, I started joking on that subject.

      I mean, it (still) feels funny. Not that autistic people are braver (often seems the opposite), we just fear different things than NT generally. So what NT people (especially kids, especially in an environment prone to bullying) fear is not what we fear.

    • 93maddie94@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      We have threat assessments at our elementary school but we go through MANY channels before police are involved. Like, is the threat credible? Is anyone fearful? Does the child have the means? Is there motive? Someone making a comment that says “because they’ll blow up” would be a freaking conversation about school appropriate language not arrest and suspensions, for ANYBODY but especially kids with documented disabilities.

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Reporting it makes sense. Investigating if the threat was credible makes sense. If it is credible, a felony then makes sense. But if it isn’t, a fine or misdemeanor is enough. Because I do agree that there should be some consequences to discourage how casually death threats and the like are thrown out these days.

      But the idea that no tolerance rules that turn kids having outbursts (disability or not) into felons makes anyone safer is laughable. Making troubled kids unnecessarily lives harder is more likely to create more danger than prevent it.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Better not say you’re going to beat everyone at the sack race in P.E. class, Billy. That’s a threat of mass violence.

      I remember going to a daycare center where not only were toy guns not allowed to be brought, not even for action figures, you couldn’t pick up a stick and use it as a gun and they would even put you in time out for a finger gun.

      This is far stupider than that.

      • jerkface@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        20 hours ago

        teaching respect for firearms at a young age is not stupid in the hellscape of a nation you live in.

    • glimse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      His autism didn’t spark fear…saying the school would blow up if anyone looked in his backpack sparked fear. He should not have been arrested but c’mon, if a kid I just met said that to me I’d call the front office, too.

      he told his teacher he didn’t want anyone to look in his backpack […] When the teacher asked why, Ty responded, “Because the whole school will blow up,”

      Arresting him was overreacting. Perceiving his words as a threat was not

      • jerkface@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        19 hours ago

        saying the school would blow up if anyone looked in his backpack sparked fear

        If you can’t tell a serious threat from mouth noises coming from a 13 year old autistic boy, then I guess its good you presumably don’t work with children.

        • glimse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          18 hours ago

          You’re right, no 13 year old autistic boy has ever made a serious threat! It’s always totally obvious if threatening words from a stranger should be taken seriously or not. Teachers are also always given the full background on every kid in their classroom without exceptions so they should have ignored protocol when hearing a kid say their backpack is going to blow up.

          How could I forget that every single kid with malice in their heart fits the brooding edgelord mold from Columbine and that having autism totally precludes violent intentions?

          Teachers DO NOT GET PAID ENOUGH for that. And even if they were paid fairly, their job isn’t to assess and handle bomb threats.

          The teacher was 100% right to call the administrators. The administrators were 100% wrong to do anything more than gently educate him on his word choice.

      • ieatpwns@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        He wasn’t wrong. Someone looked in his bag and the whole situation got blown up out of proportion over a bunny

      • Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Some kid randomly saying that and you don’t know him, ok. But the school was aware he’s autistic, so why did they suddenly forget?

        • glimse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I am saying the admins acted poorly but the teacher was justifiably scared.

          The teacher, who had only known Ty for one day, called a school administrator

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is absolutely inexcusable, but I’m not sure where the blame lies here. I think it’s with the state and in part with the cops, but not with the school, because it sounds like when the kid said “because the whole school will blow up” (I’m guessing this is a bit of hyperbole he picked up from his mom to say when there’s going to be a big uproar) they were required by law to report it.

    The article could be getting that part wrong, but Pro Publica is usually pretty thorough at these sorts of things.

    Obviously, I have a huge amount of sympathy and empathy for Ty, but if I’m right, I also have sympathy for the teacher and school officials. It’s like doctors in the South who have to choose between letting a woman die from a miscarriage or give her an abortion and go to prison.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Looks like teacher did the right thing by getting someone from the office to handle it. Everyone after that is to blame

    • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      A simple “what do you mean by blow up?” Would have avoided all of this. Especially when you know it’s coming from someone who is autistic.

    • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m willing to put a pretty big dollop of blame on the cops. An autistic kid says something without awareness of some of the context which is shown to have NO nefarious intent behind it, and nothing to show for it but a stuffed animal - and yet they slap the cuffs on anyhow.

      But we’ll find out they were at the next school shooters house 5 times and concluded that he wasn’t a threat without any more investigation than talking to him.

      • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s hard to say here. Just like it’s standard procedure to report the “potential threat”, it’s also probably SOP to secure the individual.

        Fault here lies in policy and lawmakers, IMO. This whole situation shouldn’t have to exist.

        • futatorius@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          Anyone who complies with an unjust law is collaborating with the evil swine who passed it.

          • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            20 hours ago

            Fair point, and certainly why I received down votes.

            The catch is, and the way these initiatives take hold, is that telling your “manager” at the school, or placing a potential offender in a car for a brief period, doesn’t “seem that bad” under the context of school violence.

            There are soooo many blatant disregard for the rules of humanity that are much easier to point at and say “This is wrong.”

            Not condoning the behavior, I just think those making the policies like this one should have been listening to their people, and probably weren’t (surprise, surprise) because they thought this was a “minor” point they could let slide. The news has told them otherwise.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Oh for sure. The cops could “arrest” the kid by doing something like saying, “I’m really sorry I have to do this, Ty, but you’re under arrest.” And then say, “I have investigated and found there was no cause for arrest” immediately afterward. Maybe they couldn’t make it that quick and easy, maybe they have to get some sort of permission or do paperwork or something, but I can’t believe they have to handcuff the poor kid and take him to juvie by law.

  • Verdant Banana@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    US added disabled people to the list a long time ago

    only people the US authorities do not want in prison are Blue and Red MAGAs who don’t mind playing ball

  • remer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    In class that morning, he told his teacher he didn’t want anyone to look in his backpack, worried they would confiscate his toy, according to Ty and his mom. When the teacher asked why, Ty responded, “Because the whole school will blow up,” he and his mom recalled.