• futatorius@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    An even better alternative is to replace it with nothing. The Twitter-like messaging paradigm is only good for trivia and rumor-mongering.

        • moitoi@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yeah but no. It’s not an RSS feed per se. It’s researchers sharing what they publish and what other publish with ints or resumes sometimes. Then people would comment and researchers reply.

          • brilokuloj@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Never went away, they’re still used by independent websites. A potential hurdle was that Firefox dropped native support at one point

            • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              …and a lot that are not that independent. I never stopped using RSS. It’s only because it’s not so easily monetized that it’s not more widely known, I bet.

    • marx2k@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      …or following people and interests you want to follow and keeping up with their updates.

      ffs stop gatekeeping social media

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        The facebook/mastadon format is much better for individuals, no? And Reddit/Lemmy for niches, as long as they’re supplemented by a wiki or something.

        And Tumblr. The way content gets spread organically, rather than with an algorithm, is actually super nice.

        IMO Twitter’s original premise, of letting novel, original, but very short thoughts fly into the ether has been so thoroughly corrupted that it can’t really come back. It’s entertaining and engaging, but an awful format for actually exchanging important information, like discord.

  • Mwa@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    as a Bluesky / Mastodon user, Mastodon is wayyyy better.

    • priapus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Also, a Bluesky and Mastodon user, although I use Mastodon significantly more. Both have upsides and downsides. Mastodon’s onboarding experience has improved, but it’s still worse than Bluesky’s. Also, the fact that Mastodon doesn’t federate likes is honestly very strange. It makes the platform look dead at first glance, which really hurts first impressions.

      I still prefer Mastodon, federation is great and I’ve had an easier time finding people to follow there. Bluesky’s feature of following community made feeds is really cool though.

    • Jin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      I was on Mastodon, but host or whatever you call it, didn’t like what I said and got banned.

      Feel like bluesky wouldn’t have that kind of power and control by one person and be more open and popular.

      • BeeDemocracy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I think it’s the opposite. On Mastadon you can make a new account on a better server ie mods more aligned with you. On bluesky if you make a new account and say a similar bannable thing again you’ll be banned again.

        • Jin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          But people are sensitive, rather not jump server to server because that 😅 something on equal terms like bluesky seems good.

      • Pasta Dental@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        the problem is its easier to use because there is virtually no federation. Ive yet to see a user thats not from the flagship bsky.social instance

        • mke@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          Maybe you’re already aware, but bluesky doesn’t operate with instances like in ActivityPub land.

          I’ve seen many people I believe are using their own PDS, but yes, discoverability is likely better because a relay is meant to aggregate and share all data it can (look up “bluesky firehose”).

          P.S. Mastodon’s devs are part of a new initiative to improve this area of the Fediverse. Because it’s so recent, we’ll have to wait to see how it goes.

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      I think this is the crowd that tried Mastodon and then abandoned it when they realized it required a modicum of effort.

      • ComradeMiao@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        Honestly I can’t figure out how to find people I’m interested in… or maybe there isn’t much academic/buddhism stuff on there? :/

        • XNX@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          This smug attitude is why the fediverse will stay niche. People get jobs from twitter and Bluesky showing their posts to people. Its why im on the platforms as an artist. But sure lets talk shit at everyone who doesnt want to post to the void on mastodon.

          Also your feed is chronological by default on bluesky and you can stay chronological and enable some posts from your custom feeds to show in your chronological feed. Best of both worlds

          • timconspicuous@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Seriously, I’m so tired of this “we on Mastodon are the Eloi and they on Bluesky are the Morlocks” type bs, that kind of hostility to regular users makes me not want to be on the Fediverse at all.

            • XNX@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              It’s a problem in the open source community as a whole. People ask for it to be a little easier because they’re not super skilled with tech and then the reaction is “if your so dumb you cant use this then maybe you shouldnt use it” or something to that extent

  • vga@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    For a sense of perspective, Twitter has 106 million users in USA. 700 000 is 0.67% of that.

    • Vanon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Also for a sense of perspective, Twitter is owned by a Trump salesman that lies about everything (including user numbers that affect ad revenue). I’ve seen Bluesky users mention that actual engagement with real people is already higher than Twitter. It definitely feels more “alive” to me as well.

    • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      This is additional new users not total users. Growing by 0.67% of the user count of the largest microblogging platform in the world in a week is absolutely massive.

      • silver_wings_of_morning@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        I think the poster wants to say it means not that many in the US are leaving twitter or looking for alternatives, contrary to what the headline suggests.

        • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Perhaps. Overall Bluesky is massive already tho. Twitter has something like 220 million users with Bluesky being around 14 million. Having 6% of the user count of Twitter is already beyond critical mass for the average user. People will be able to satisfy their microblogging itch on bluesky which means they wont go back. It has all the drama, porn and politics that twitter had.

  • krimson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Everything is better than Twitter I guess.

    Is this running on a modified version of Mastodon?