• MudMan@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I think this thread is meant to flatter programmers and make linguists and sociologists extremely angry.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      IDK, comparing Javascript to English while Java to German seems to either overblow the value of javascript or diminish the value of English.

      • dosuser123456@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        25 days ago

        makes sense though. the definition on english speakers and js devs is accurate, english derived from german and js derived from java.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          25 days ago

          English is derived from Latin as it was taught by Roman Legionaries, but German has large influences from both Latin and Indo-European languages.

    • lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      How so? Except the first sentence which is obviously not serious, I would agree with all linguistic statements or at least not disagree with any.

      • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I think the first sentence is probably enough to make anyone not afflicted with a eurocentric brain want to palm some face.

        I think excusing it as a “not serious” statement is dangerous, as a lot of people even on Lemmy won’t second guess it.

        The belief that the west is the origin of all science and culture is surprisingly pervasive, especially in the tech industry.

        • MudMan@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          “The root of all modern languages” is a heck of a thing to say about Latin, and I’m pretty sure several billion people haven’t quite gotten that memo. Calling a chunk of Europe and a thin slice of Africa “the entire Universe” is also a spicy take. Come for the programmer humor, recoil in disgust for the rampant ethnocentrism, I guess.

      • randomname01@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        For one, Latin has more fancy rules than French. I guess the subjunctive is probably something English speakers might consider fancy, but Latin has that too. Latin has more times that are conjugations of the core verb (rather than needing auxiliary verbs), has grammatical cases (like German, but two more if you include vocative) and, idk, also just feels fancier in general.

        I’ll admit it’s been years since I actually read any Latin and that I only have a surface level understanding of all languages mentioned except for French, but this post reads like it’s about the stereotypes of the countries rather than being about the languages themselves.

        • lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          First, I wouldn’t count the vocative but let’s not get into this debate. Counting cases, Russian wins until you include other balto slavic languages or even Uralic ones.

          Fancy is a very subjective term. Auxiliary verbs are fancy in their own way. From an orthographical viewpoint, French is quite fancy with all the silent letters, the way vocals are pronounced and stuff. French had like one spelling “reform” and it was like let’s make it more obvious we decent from Latin. Grammar wise it’s just like the other romance languages from what I know. They once got rid of the silent <s> and put a “gravestone” on the letter before (^) that has no other meaning than here was a silent s. Wouldn’t you call that fancy? Who would call it fancy? Mwa Moi!

          • Dewe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Haha I decline your proposal not to get into that debate: the vocative is a grammatical case. Maybe not every noun can be put in the vocative, but it’s definitely one of the cases. Even the locative is a case, even though only a couple of nouns use it.

            • lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              To be clear, in general the vocative is a case eg in Czech and other balto slavic languages (except eg standard Russian while colloquial Russian is developing a new unrelated one).

              In Latin tho, it’s more a relict. Other cases have relicts, too, still I wouldn’t say Latin has the locative.

              I would argue that being a relict is a spectrum. Technically, it is a case with many syncretism to nominative, since it is obligatory for those nouns. In the context of LAtiN hAs sOo0 ManY cAsES, it’s not.

  • vga@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    PHP is Russian. Used to be huge, caused lots of problems, now slowly dwindling away. Its supporters keep saying how it’s still better than the competition.