I sure hope you meant plight of the Palestinians…
I sure hope you meant plight of the Palestinians…
Yeah I’ve fallen into this trap before as well. When I shop for a desktop, I tend to go as high-end as I can afford and then sit on the same machine for 7-10 years until it becomes unusable/support begins to wain. That desktop sits under my desk and doesn’t move that whole time, it is in a very controlled environment.
You cannot shop that way for a laptop that will be moved and handled and charged and stowed and scratched and bumped and bent and twisted. Even if you take excellent care of it.
I can’t believe Microsoft is doing EEE on malware
I wish instead of complaining to people that they didn’t read the docs or whatever that linux devs would scour the internet for these criticisms (like when specifics are provided) and then develop solutions for them.
Yeah, people are shitting on your product because it’s not obvious. Make it more obvious!
(Thankfully this is starting to happen…)
Incredible how many people skip the article and substitute their own reality before commenting.
Article says nothing about Apple allowing law enforcement access to any user data.
There has always been plenty to criticize about Apple, but some of you people see their name and just get so [TRIGGERED]
It’s next to X and C on the keyboard, so you don’t have to move your fingers much to cut/copy then paste quickly.
Every time we do it we learn from it. That’s nowhere near zero.
I think /mnt is where you manually mount a hard drive or other device if you’re just doing it temporarily, and /media has sub folders for stuff like cdrom drives or thumb drives?
I’ve been on “New, 6 hours” since the beginning and even that seems stagnant. At times, there’s lots of cross posting.
That or Ansible, if you will have a machine to deploy from
Never thought I’d get to use “bisectional” outside of JD Vance jokes
……t’meeeeeeeeeEEEEEEeeeeeeeEeEeEeEe
🎹
No, no - legit! Do go on.
Formulating an exit plan because he just shit his pants
I mean, you can use other systems besides cryptographic proof-of-work to determine legitimacy of stakeholders of a blockchain. It doesn’t necessarily have to waste power.
That being said, none of the other alternatives are really viable either. Proof-of-stake? So the “richest” people on the chain control all the money? Sounds like we just reinvented the late-stage-capitalism we already have.
And who would the largest nodes on that blockchain be? The banks? Who could say and do whatever they conspired since they command >50% of the computing power and/or value?
The average person isn’t going to build a fucking blockchain node just to keep the deed to their house.
“Grandma, please you need to fill your basement with these ASICs or else script kiddies will steal your house”
Hades
Exactly. These kind of things happen from time to time; hell even big corpo OSes mess up. They said they’d taken time to fix their process to prevent this problem happening again.
If it becomes a pattern I’d become concerned. So far, it was inconvenient.
It’s Twitter