Glancing over their other comments for about 15 seconds, I’m going to vote yes: it’s sarcasm.
College Prof in the US, focus areas are Human-Computer Interaction, Cybersecurity, and Machine Learning
Glancing over their other comments for about 15 seconds, I’m going to vote yes: it’s sarcasm.
Ok, you are entitled to your opinion, but the claim was that Christian churches and Christian church goers weren’t being targeted or “demonized,” which I’ve shown is false. Both with an example from yesterday morning, and an aggregate data set which shows some level of significance. Now, whether you want to argue if it is deserved, or proportional, or whatever else is up to you and your morals. However, the original claim that Christians are not the target of harassment because of their religious affiliation is simply not true.
I thought that the article being from this morning would say enough, but I mean… https://www.christianpost.com/news/436-acts-of-hostility-against-us-churches-documented-in-2023.html
On the flip side, the font caught my eye and made me want to read what it said.
Which then took 5 minutes because I couldn’t easily read what it said. But still, good marketing of a comment
https://youtu.be/gMPAHL4K-FA?si=JpOUcqVwK8wu8GwK