Did I say he was winning? Where? Show me!

Biden had beaten him before. And many people will vote for a shit stain against trump.

It’s not like that, it’s the other way around. The main goal is to destroy corbyn (or any real leftist). None of them care for Palestinians even in a way to think of them, let alone dwell on their humanity. They are a tool if needed.

You are not willing to make your stance on stalin and putin clear. You didn’t want to say how old you are. You didnt even say you don’t want to say. All you do is try these weird childish insults. It’s boring and I have no time for that. Bye.

🥱

I asked a sincere question, one you are not willing answer it seems.

I’m a troll? You are the one that thinks that by calling me childish names will me upset somehow. Like, I can get upset, but this, this is like some basic school level. Gotcha?

Its fine if you are a kid. I don’t care. You can lie or tell the truth.

I didn’t ask that.

That’s a most strange assumption you made. Why would I know such a basic thing? Gotcha? This is very strange. How old are you?

You took something you liked, from something you don’t and said this is the part that makes your other thing great.

And then called me to educate myself… again…

So you believe in authoritarian state in the sense of stalin and putin?

That’s a miserable response and compete wrong. Bye

Removed by mod

Ah. I didn’t know.

When people respond, there are a few different forms the response comes in. By far the worst is one that tries to completely deny the original post by finding weird circumstances in which individual statements of the op aren’t true and do so in a rude way and/or childishly patronising way.

That’s you. Though, great that you like capitalisms public sector 😂.

This is really one sided. I’m not saying there isn’t truth in it, but there are also other factors. Communist revolutions can be bloody and can lead to authoritarian states. They can be inefficient and stifle innovation. It often was just a power grab not an attempt to make a country better for everyone.

I wouldn’t want to live in the mid 20. century idea of communism. But otherwise I support that the means of production belongs to the worker and anyone affected by the production.

Pointless semantics.

You missed the point again, oh dear! Let me try again in simpler terms : you yourself dont define words, how they are used in the public does. So if the world calls it ai, then the word will mean what everybody means when they use it.

This is how the words come to be, evolve and are at the end put in the dictionary. Nobody cares what you think. Ai today includes ML. Get over it.

Nice try with deflection attempts, but I really don’t care about them, I’m only here to teach you where words come from and to tell you, the article is written about you.

Also that I’m out of time for this. Bye.

Well not at all. What a word means is not defined by what you might think. When the majority starts to use a word for something and that sticks, it can be adopted. That happens all the time and I have read articles about it many times. Even for our current predicament. Language is evolving. Meanings change. And yes ai today includes what is technically machine learning. Sorry friend, that’s how it works. Sure you can be the grumpy drunk at a bar complaining that this is not strictly ai by some definition while the rest of the world rolls their eyes and proceeds to more meaningful debates.

Yes, lots of people are using this argument when reacting negatively.