Presumably what the other commenter was referring to is the US having the oldest codified constitution
Presumably what the other commenter was referring to is the US having the oldest codified constitution
Oh sure, there’s definitely lots of valid criticism of rainbow capitalism, but to be clear, it’s not pride month itself that’s the issue there - it’s corporations leveraging it for profit
But the serious answer is because LGBTQ people have been systemically discriminated against in pretty much every country
Literally the next thing in my All feed is about the previous US president having a chill time with a man who proposed stoning gay people to death
Efficiency, efficiency, efficiency
Edit: don’t forget the fatphobia!
Which bit did I make up?
Ah yes, because there definitely wasn’t some other common characteristic to the (not only leftist, as you carefully avoided mentioning) parties that were banned
Something like, I don’t know, supporting the country actively invading Ukraine, perhaps?
Source?
Edit: so I figured I go investigate for myself and by “Ukraine” you mean random citizens involved in what was basically a civil war, the people in the building were using it as a fortress, and blockaded themselves inside, and by “people” you meant Russian separatist insurrectionists, who were firing from the building and throwing Molotov cocktails into the crowd below.
That’ll be “marxist-leninist”
The fuck did Ukraine do?
Two important persons from US history, a deity and a little penguin
It’s just a shitpost, not a declaration that Trump was some great American historical figure, chill
The test team, standing half inside and half outside the eclipse: uncannyuncanny picpic
Super+X, I
gang
While this is still a big number, Russia’s oil revenue both from the EU and in total has been massively reduced.
I think it’s hard to argue reducing dependency on resources from a frequently hostile country is “harming themselves”, especially since Russia has intentionally interrupted supply as leverage.
deleted by creator
“Quora is not a good source” is not an ad hominem.
libs are invariably unable to actually engage with the content
This, however, is exactly that
Ok 👍