• ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    10 months ago

    Having a separate, open source JavaScript engine is in everyone’s interests even if they don’t know what they’d lose without the Mozilla Foundation and Firefox. I’m a web developer and Mozilla has protected the open web for all of us and if people understood what they’ve done, they’d all donate.

    Google and Microsoft cannot and should not control standards. Mozilla is the conscience of the industry. Support it or you won’t know what you lost.

    • AlteredStateBlob@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      I was donating until I got an email telling me to donate more signed by their CEO or something who earns a couple hundred thousand a year.

      Mind, I wasn’t opted into communcation like that. Only updates and news this was neither. If their new CEO cleans house and refocuses as they said they will, I will consider renewing my donations again.

      • Ephera@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        The CEO of the Mozilla Corporation shouldn’t be asking for donations. It’s the non-profit Mozilla Foundation which collects donations (and owns the Mozilla Corporation). It is a bit confusing, yes…

        • Amju Wolf@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          …and, more importantly, none of the donations go towards Firefox development. Instead they go towards “causes” that Mozilla Foundation finds worthy, and usually they have nothing to do with the open web.

      • Orbituary@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        A couple hundred thousand is a pittance if he’s keeping shit together. When CEOs push 500 to over a million at a nonprofit, that’s absurdity.

        • Deceptichum@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          She received 6.9 million dollars in 2022 and 5 million in 2021, 3 million in 2020.

          CEOs are scum who do not earn anywhere near close to that. They should be lucky to get a couple hundred thousand.

          And fuck Firefox having the nerve to ask for donations.

        • emax_gomax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          She.

          And how are they keeping anything together. Market share isn’t substantially better than before and rather than focusing on the product mozilla was created for they keep pivoting to weird BS like this AI grab. I actually think market shares gone up recently… cause google pushed through manifestv3. That would’ve happened even if mozilla did nothing. I think mozillq is still the better browser but that sure as hell doesn’t seem to be because of whose in charge.

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          When CEOs push 500 to over a million at a nonprofit, that’s absurdity.

          If any CEO should make this much, I think it’s the one helping to keep browser choice a thing

    • Vincent@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Support it or you won’t know what you lost.

      Note that the best way to support it is to actually use its products, Firefox in particular. That’s what gives Mozilla the ability to influence the direction of the web and web standards.

    • just_another_person@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      They actually have money in the bank, they just aren’t profitable on their own in any way, and rely on search partnerships for yearly funds. I think they are just being responsible here and cutting people who aren’t working on relevant projects going forward.

      • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’m not saying they are the right size. Just that if we lose Mozilla and Firefox, it’ll be almost as bad as losing Wikimedia for certain things. We need to protect the open web.

    • mindlight@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      The problem is that the vast majority of end users prefer apps over websites. They have no clue whatsoever that 99% of all apps are essentially just wrapped websites.

      Since Mozilla has been unable to find a viable business model (No, relying on Google handouts is not a viable business model) I fear that there is only one possible future and a free web is not part of it.

      • rwhitisissle@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        This is the only realistic answer. Corporations have effectively decided that the future of the web is closed source proprietary javascript bloatware apps that are all functional skinner boxes. Many people, especially young people, have no clue how to use an actual computer. It’s “click the bubble to make it pop and give us your mom’s credit card number to unlock super premium bubbles.” That’s the future of the internet. But probably worse.

      • Ephera@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yeah, employing this many employees, the donations would not cover it and you can hardly guarantee a stable job position. It might take just one scandal (whether it’s true or not) for everyone to stop donating.

        The Mozilla Foundation uses donation money rather for political activism and they’ve also often distributed money to important open-source projects which are too small to collect donations.