• Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 months ago

    I did. The author talks about both and associates one with the other. It really only talks about 2 factors: web page size and CPU utilization. And that CPU speed hasn’t out paced web page bloat. And then uses the data table to try and prove the point.

    I’m not denying that low end devices can have trouble browsing the web. I have issue with the claim that CPU performance hasn’t scaled with web page bloat because there are far more factors than just CPU performance and web page bloat in the tests, such as: everything else running on the device (OS, other apps, etc) RAM speed and size, storage speed and size (hopefully doesn’t come into play but you never know), network connectivity strength, etc.

    It’s not even close to an “all else equal” type of testing.

    • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Those so-called low-end devices are still technically fairly powerful computing devices that aren’t even used used to do anything that ought to be very taxing. They’re displaying what ought to basically be a text medium.

      In my eyes the problem is squarely with the way the sites are designed (and their 967 partners that are interested in whatever you’re clicking on).