You cannot get an unbiased opinion asking on reddit or especially lemmy since this is where predominantly fedora and arch purists live.

What you will see is Fedora users hate Manjaro’s popularity because they are in direct competition. Fedora is the downstream of RHL just as Ubuntu is downstream of Debian and Manjaro is Downstream of Arch. RPM and RHL just have not gained traction over the years from new users due to Debian and Arch dominance.

Second are the Arch purists who will tell you that Manjaro is not arch since similarly Ubuntu is not debian. But what happens is you get tons of newbs coming to Arch and in the support forums and arch purists realize that Manjaro has a popularity which makes them jealous. Similar to how debian purists act towards ubuntu newbs .

The thing is, when a big team and community establish a polished down stream service, it will always be more popular and more polished than the upstream since it is building on what the upstream have already provided.

Manjaro is amazing . They really are the ubuntu of arch.

A fedora or arch purist cannot handle those words and will have to find something that happened while back with SSL keys getting miss managed or experimentors who mix a ton of AUR packages with their testing branches etc.

Well ubuntu users screw up their systems when they mix a bunch of debian packages into it. Same thing.

Manjaro to be honesty is frankly killing it. Amazing team and stable rolling downstream arch for newbs. They have three streams, unstable, testing and stable. I’ve been on stable for years with zero issues. I’ve got a few AUR packages which build easily . Plus new users get adequately warned when adding AUR packages and mostly it is not necessary since manjaro provides everything in their repos anyways. Installing flatpaks are a sinch and even git packages through the AUR.

The interface is also amazingly polished and I LOVE the ease they give you of installing newer or older kernels.