Howdy! I’m new here and was hoping someone might have some insight to a question I’ve been thinking about for a while:

If I saved up my money and bought a tractor, would it be permissible/ethical to charge others to use it when I didn’t need it?

This seems awfully similar to owning the means of production. What if I instead offered to plow their fields for them instead, driving the tractor myself and negotiating fair compensation in exchange?

Sorry if this is basic stuff I’m still learning. 🙏

  • knitwitt@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    If I understand correctly, society would democratically decide that lightbulbs are approved for private ownership but that tractors would not be?

    • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      It doesnt necessarily mean direct democracy on every miniscule detail of societal organization, there would be - as is now - a bunch of well versed administrators, scientists, economists, ideologists and so forth working out the most practical and efficient way to do things.

      • knitwitt@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Either way I’m not sure why it’s anyone else’s business whether or not I simply own the thing. If I’m the only one who uses it, it’s not harming anyone else.

        If I don’t feel like ploughing the fields by hand, shouldn’t it be my decision to invest my labour into something that will make my life easier, regardless of what others think?

        • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          The basic idea of shared means is that if you let someone privately own the means you deprive everyone else of that resource, unless you pay them to use the means, and then you are back to private ownership.

          You are also creating an incentive not to share your tilling machine freely, because you’re now in debt and if you let your neighbors use it for free, why is that fair if you paid for it? Might as well charge them for it, and if youre smart you start lobbying against the others buying a communal machine, because then nobody would pay to loan out yours any more.

          Instead the tilling machine is paid for by all local farmers together, meaning nobody has to go in debt or pay for using it. Who gets to use it and when is just a matter of scheduling, and if wait times are too long you buy another together.