• emptyother@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      Microsoft could have done it if storage was all. They got the infrastructure, the tech, cdn infrastructure , and even had a lot of big business customers already using Azures media streaming services. Instead they are withdrawing.

      • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        6 months ago

        And the fact that Microsoft noped out says it all.

        Basically, the only orgs that have a snowball’s chance of hosting a twitch/youtube are Amazon, Google, and Microsoft on account of them also being three of the largest “cloud” providers and having the resources at cost. Amazon/Twitch are scrambling to find a way to deal with the increasing shift to sponsored streams, Google/Youtube are cracking down on adblockers, and Microsoft just gave up.

      • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I said infrastructure, not just storage. and yes there is even more involved like the user base, as we have seen with social media time and time again. Even if Microsoft built an even better YouTube (lol), it’s still very likely no one would use it. It’s a massive investment with a lot of risk.

    • KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      every computer gets a government-mandated tool installed that reserves 50% of your upload speed to help host YouTube. If you are caught without it, You’re going to jail.

      /s