I guess the data mining was the missing ingredient for popularity?

  • killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    8 months ago

    It wasn’t about video length, it was about the Twitter leadership at that time being categorically incapable of monetizing any of their products.

    Combine that with the orders-of-magnitude higher cost of running Vine compared to the bird, and it was always either going to be sold off or shut down.

    It’s easy to forget that this was back in the time when these companies thought they were changing the planet for the better and drinking their own Kool aid by the gallon.

    • squiblet@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      8 months ago

      The video length was pretty limiting, though. Instagram at the time started doing 15 second videos. The six seconds lent itself to goofy comedy and not much more.

      It seems like they should have sold it. Or just jammed in a bunch of ads… maybe an option to remove ads with a paid membership. Simply killing it doesn’t make any money other than to avoid losing more, and they’d already invested a fair bit which you can’t recoup by just closing something. Of course, Google does that all the time I guess.

      • HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        Maybe they saw it as an acqui-hire moment to get their staff, or at least keep them from going ro a conpetitor.

        Of course, that assumes social media owners have clues and strategy; it seems like a lot of them were “we stumbled into vsast success, now what.”