• sep@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    Everybody would love 2 or 3 more good healthy alternative to even the playing field. Because having the future of fun hang by the tread of a single not-corrupt-to-the-core company is fucking stressfull. But dunking on valve is not the way to a healthy gaming marketplace.

    • Spedwell@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      I will continue dunking on Valve as long as they remain the reason good, healthy alternatives can’t exist. I will not re-hash the whole arguments here, please see my other replies in this thread.

      • sep@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I have read your arguments, I just fundamentaly disagree. I do not want to lower the ceiling until valve is as crappy as the rest. I want the floor to rise. Basically valve do not stop other companies from competing. Nothing is stopping EGS from including and contributing to proton. allowing and even helping developers to have their games on multiple marketplaces. Building awesome services to provide to developers.

        • Spedwell@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Basically valve do not stop other companies from competing

          So is there something you didn’t understand that I can clarify, or are we in agreement that Valve needs to discard the PMFN policy?

          • sep@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Is it a shitty businiss practice? Absolutly. Should valve as the only company allow others to under cut them? No that would be insane. Should it be regulated as illegal businiss practices for everyone - yes absolutly.