• GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    5 months ago

    Once you’re older than 15 you will discover that a few things in life can have a massive impact on your general well being and health, and it absolutely makes sense to spend big on those. Good shoes are one of these things, a quality mattress appropriate for your body type is another.

    • Lizardking27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I didn’t say not to buy quality shoes, but those are $100 max, if someone spends more on a logo, they’re a chump.

      When you’re older than 15, your reading comprehension will improve and you’ll be better able to understand what grownups mean with their words.

      • nomous@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Bro I have bad feet after years of wearing shitty chucks and vans. $100 is like the entry level for good “adult” shoes. Even then you’re probably walking around in some neon Asics or something.

        edit: orthotics are your friend but they’re not cheap either

        • skulblaka@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 months ago

          Chucks and Vans are definitely not good shoes. They are stylish shoes, but the shoe itself is a piece of cloth over a piece of cardboard. No wonder you have bad feet, bro, you’ve been walking on trash.

          I bought a pair of steel toe boots with good insole and arch support for about $85 three years ago and those things are still going strong. Comfy and durable. If you’ve got big feet or want nicer boots than me, that can range up to about $150, anything higher than that is designer bullshit. Don’t fall for a brand name.

          • flerp@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            5 months ago

            That’s what they said… they said they had bad feet from years of wearing those shitty shoes.

        • Lizardking27@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          I’m sorry but $100 is absolutely not “entry-level”

          Stop paying for logos. You’re being scammed.

          • nomous@lemmy.world
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 months ago

            Friend I’ve worn 50 different brands at a dozen different price points, until you’re a podiatrist you don’t have a clue what you’re talking about.

      • Soleos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        When you mature as a human being, whatever age that may be, you develop kindness through a willingness to understand and empathize with perspectives that conflict with your own. That doesn’t necessarily mean you have to accept it for yourself. For many people, clothing is not simply a means of pragmatic function. It’s also a source of self-expression, joy, and beauty. Now for me, $600 for a pair of sneakers is exorbitant and ridiculous no matter who designed it. But it’s not a product for me. And if someone with the means feels great buying and wearing them, I don’t see the harm. I don’t usually pay more than I have to for footwear, but I would pay a premium for certain kitchen tools I use all the time if I like the design, enjoy looking at it, and feel good using it. What I do sympathize with and would like to see reduced in harm is the consumerist culture that pressures people with less means into feeling like they have to have such things for fulfillment.

        • Lizardking27@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          “What I do sympathize with and would like to see reduced in harm is the consumerist culture that pressures people with less means into feeling like they have to have such things for fulfillment.”

          We’re saying the same exact thing. You just went on a long preachy monologue first to try to make yourself seem smarter/superior to others, while simultaneously being denigrative towards the people you’re addressing, which is the exact thing you’re preaching about not doing. Furthermore, you didn’t even reply to the right person, I’m not the one who chose to disagree with someone only to then say the exact thing they just said.

          Everyone in this thread is just repeating the same thing I said yet somehow I’m the asshole. Get a grip, people.

          • flerp@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 months ago

            The fact that you don’t understand that you’re NOT saying the same thing… is pretty sad. Not sure if it’s because you have poor reading comprehension or that you’re just so clearly emotionally invested in this that you can’t see it clearly, but either way, it’s pretty sad.