• nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 months ago

    They didn’t say centrists bad, they said arguing for compromise with bad actors (those that deny provable facts) is bad.

    • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      They are smearing “centrists” and the “right” in every comment dude…

      And no, they just have an axe to grind for anyone who doesn’t align politically with them.

      In a functioning democracy a “centrist” would have the good ideas of both the progressives and conservatives. So there isn’t anything about denying probable facts, and the rant they’re going on about 2+2=6 is a strawman fallacy to derail the conversation. Since that’s the uniquely US issue…

      • Carlo@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        You’re really proving their point here. You’re starting with the false assumption that both sides have good ideas, and the best solution must be somewhere in the middle. If one side’s platform is based entirely on lies, this is an idiotic position to take. It’s an ideology for privileged autofellatio enthusiasts who haven’t bothered to really figure out what’s going on, because it’s much easier to just pretend you’re the smart one, and everyone’s getting upset over nothing.