• soloner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 months ago

    I think it’s because they think the trans woman still has biologically male factors that make the competition not a competition.

    • qantravon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      3 months ago

      There is no trans woman in this case. A female boxer, born and raised as a woman, is being attacked and called a man. What OP is saying is that it’s basically because they don’t see her as attractive, and that’s definitely a major component of it.

      What it comes down to is that they’re so obsessed with the idea of trans women that they start seeing them everywhere, and it usually comes down to someone not being quite feminine enough in some way, though there have been cases of people trying to claim some of the most conventionally attractive women in the world were secretly trans.

    • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      They think she’s not fuckable and therefore she’s not a woman. All the proof I need is the literal fact that she’s not trans.

      • soloner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah fair enough. I looked her up on Wikipedia and verified. However she failed sex eligibility test in 2023 IBA.

        Khelif had been disqualified by the IBA hours before the gold medal match in 2023, reportedly for having high levels of testosterone.

        • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          27
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Worth noting that the IBA is not considered credible by the IOC, is considered highly influenced by Russian corruption, and that this failure came just after she defeated a Russian.

          Also, despite whatever tests she may have failed in the past, she passed eligibility tests to compete in these Olympics.

              • OneMeaningManyNames@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                Yes, we were expecting a clue that transphobe halfwits are ignorant. Can they even define what trans is? I don’t think so.

            • FromPieces@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              I know it involves a test of testosterone levels. I don’t know the limits of those tests, how much testosterone means a person isn’t a woman anymore.

              • OneMeaningManyNames@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                3 months ago

                And as I read some where here, if testosterone levels is unfair advantage why aren’t there limits in the men’s league too? It is so just they police women bodies (cis and trans alike). Here is the original comment but I did not record the username, so sadly I can’t credit them

                If testosterone is a PED and it doesn’t matter if the athlete is cis or not, then there should be a hard limit for both male and female athletes to ensure fairness. If too much testosterone is only a problem for women then clearly it’s a sexist attempt to police women’s bodies. Every human body produces some amount of testosterone, either too much is an unfair advantage or it isn’t.