• Cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    I understand that, but still, the decision is a net negative. They are merely acting based on short-sighted insights.

    • RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Yeah that was kinda my point. All that matters is what the spreadsheet looks like now. It would have probably been a net positive to keep me given they are only going to grow and spend a fortune on hiring and new stocks. That’s a different spreadsheet though, I also live in a country where it’s expensive to fire full time employees collectively, so it’s not like they are paying these kinds of sums for everyone. It’s pretty cheap to make things look good on paper.

      • rasakaf679@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yeah, their whole goal is to look good on papers and stock market. Not to grow as actual company. They would rather cripple themselves than to strengthen themselves by slow growth…