• mipadaitu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      But if I join a union, then I might have to pay union dues!!! Getting a 20% raise isn’t worth losing 2% to dues!!!

      • tourist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        On a similar note, paying 10% of my total income to health insurance is absolutely worth it, because they partially pay for 3 doctors visits per year and tell me to go fuck myself when I need antidepressants or Advil.

        • Zink@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          The typical high deductible health plans these days only seem to work well for people that need like no healthcare, or people who need a ton of it.

          My secret trick is to have an incurable condition where the medications to hopefully stabilize you or slow progress of the disease are so hilariously expensive that the pharma company will pay all of my out of pocket costs. It’s like my employer pays me my salary, then my insurance company pays an entire separate yearly salary to the pharma company.

      • qaz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Have you considered how many video games you can buy using all that money you saved on union dues?

      • ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        You need to phrase that differently.

        It’s not 20% raise, it’s 1/5 more. And it’s not 2% dues, it’s 1/50 less.

        See the dues are definitely worse!!!

          • ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            One of the most vivid arithmetic failings displayed by Americans occurred in the early 1980s, when the A&W restaurant chain released a new hamburger to rival the McDonald’s Quarter Pounder. With a third-pound of beef, the A&W burger had more meat than the Quarter Pounder; in taste tests, customers preferred A&W’s burger. And it was less expensive. A lavish A&W television and radio marketing campaign cited these benefits. Yet instead of leaping at the great value, customers snubbed it.

            Only when the company held customer focus groups did it become clear why. The Third Pounder presented the American public with a test in fractions. And we failed. Misunderstanding the value of one-third, customers believed they were being overcharged. Why, they asked the researchers, should they pay the same amount for a third of a pound of meat as they did for a quarter-pound of meat at McDonald’s. The “4” in “¼,” larger than the “3” in “⅓,” led them astray.

            Did Third-of-a-Pound Burger Fail Because People Didn’t Understand Fractions? by Snopes, June 17, 2022