• Jin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      I was on Mastodon, but host or whatever you call it, didn’t like what I said and got banned.

      Feel like bluesky wouldn’t have that kind of power and control by one person and be more open and popular.

      • BeeDemocracy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 hours ago

        I think it’s the opposite. On Mastadon you can make a new account on a better server ie mods more aligned with you. On bluesky if you make a new account and say a similar bannable thing again you’ll be banned again.

        • Jin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          But people are sensitive, rather not jump server to server because that 😅 something on equal terms like bluesky seems good.

      • Pasta Dental@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        the problem is its easier to use because there is virtually no federation. Ive yet to see a user thats not from the flagship bsky.social instance

        • mke@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          Maybe you’re already aware, but bluesky doesn’t operate with instances like in ActivityPub land.

          I’ve seen many people I believe are using their own PDS, but yes, discoverability is likely better because a relay is meant to aggregate and share all data it can (look up “bluesky firehose”).

          P.S. Mastodon’s devs are part of a new initiative to improve this area of the Fediverse. Because it’s so recent, we’ll have to wait to see how it goes.