• FaceDeer@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    8 days ago

    The whole point of poetry is that it’s an original expression of another human.

    Who are you to decide what the “point” of poetry is?

    Maybe the point of poetry is to make the reader feel something. If AI-generated poetry can do that just as well as human-generated poetry, then it’s just as good when judged in that manner.

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        I’ve never heard of that, but assuming that’s a real thing and you’re telling the truth, it still doesn’t mean you get to decide what the “point” of poetry is for everybody else.

        You aren’t the arbiter of what people are allowed to enjoy or see value in. If ‘Poem XYZ’ resonates with a bunch of people, but you hate it on principle because of how it was created, that doesn’t make their viewpoint invalid. To think it does is extremely arrogant.

        • FaceDeer@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          7 days ago

          The Darvaza gas crater is a hole in Turkmenistan that’s leaking natural gas and is on fire. I’m quite sure they don’t have a “poet laureate”, it’s literally just a hole in the ground.

          But even if it was some metropolis, yeah, he’d be just some guy.

        • DancingBear@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          I’m sorry but he really is the arbiter of who gets to decide the meaning of poetry, how the subjective experience of emotion is correctly described in written form, as well as the one who decides what is valuable and what should rightfully be cast aside and shunned, and even boooed!

          All hail the Darvaza Gas Crater!!!