• anus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    21 days ago

    This is such a stupid take, the author is either a lemming or doesn’t understand how resources and commodities work

        • kofe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          21 days ago

          So how many images would need to be generated at once to take down a city 👀

            • RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              edit-2
              21 days ago

              1,063,829,787

              It would be that many times the squared volume of a 200x200 image. Which is already 40,000 pixels. Multiply those together and you get 4.25 million megapixels (which are 1 billion pixels each), aka 4.25 gigapixels. It’s extremely large but not unachievable.

              People are AI generating entire movies which are 24-30 pictures per second. Seems like you could hit really big numbers really really fast.

              • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                20 days ago

                People are AI generating entire movies which are 24-30 pictures per second.

                I don’t think they’re generating those movies in real time.

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        20 days ago

        because people just make shit up and post it on the internet, and other people content with making shit up and posting it on the internet go “wow good post”

        and then nobody bothers fact checking anything ever.

        like i understand the anti AI sentiment, but please do yourself a favor and use actually good arguments against it, not stupid arguments that make you look incompetent and silly.