• frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      That’s not what you said

      You said a company would threaten someone’s family to force them to work for that company. I am not aware of any time in recent history that a company has done this.

      Obviously a large corporation would kill people and they do.

      • deaf_fish@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Do you need specific threats or will just the threat of death due exposure and or starving death because you can’t pay for food or shelter?

        • frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          For your statements to make sense, it need to driven by a specific actor not the system as a whole. Ie, yes, a specific threat.

          • deaf_fish@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Hmm, I haven’t found any historical examples of specific threats against families. I am a bit surprised, if they are willing to kill workers, why not also threaten their families?

            Also my statement was corpos in general. So it was a systemic argument.

        • kerrigan778@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          I don’t know, only you can know your own integrity. Are some people homeless or hungry or both because there are things they won’t do for money though? Yes, of course.

          • deaf_fish@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            So you would be ok with your family starving because you won’t work for military corporation? If true I admire your dedication, but I couldn’t do go through with it.