• Sybil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    no. I think they could have won 100 years ago and I think they could win tomorrow. I like the tactic. people can be inspired and it can happen in an instant.

    • brain_in_a_box@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I think they could have won 100 years ago

      And yet they didn’t

      and I think they could win tomorrow.

      And yet they won’t.

          • Sybil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            you don’t know the future anymore than I. you don’t know what the next revolution will look like or what would start it.

              • Sybil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                do I want to bet that you don’t know the future? absolutely. here’s a proof.

                knowledge is defined as a justified true belief.
                you can't have evidence about the future because it hasn't happened.
                truth claims about the future have no value because it hasn't happened.
                there is no justification that can produce knowledge about the future.
                
                you don't know the future.
                

                qed

                edit: oh fuck. I was supposed to bet something. how about a loaf of bread?

                  • Sybil@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    are you suggesting that Marxist revolutionary theory is a science like meteorology? it’s not.