• Rooty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    Reducing widespread human rights abuses in the Soviet Union to “one famine” shows a heady mixture of deliberate ignorance with hubris that only a western university educated leftist can posess.

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      The sad thing is, famines weren’t that widespread after a while, unless your standard of “famine” is “not eating beef steaks in a country where beef aren’t that common”.

    • theonlytruescotsman@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      The ussr was infinitely better for human rights than what came before or after in Russia and the baltics, and was better than all “free nations” at the time until the late 1970s, when a few European nations decided to ignore France, the UK, and the US and write their own laws.

      • Justas🇱🇹@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        The WHAT?

        Please explain to me how sending most of the Baltic intelligensia to die in Siberia and replacing them with Russian settlers who held most positions of power was better for my rights than what I have right now.

        Please tell me how great my grandmother in law had it living in the outskirts of Archangelsk in a wooden barrack because she was sent there against her will, how much more rights and opportunities she had back then.

        Please explain to me how great the industrial management in the USSR was, where they built a bunch of heavy industries in countries that had few mineral resources to support them locally, leading to plant closures in the 90s.

        Before WWII, Estonia was a bit richer than Finland. Not it is lagging behind by decades.