Summary

Bishop Garrison, a former Pentagon official who led a 2021 investigation into military extremism, warns that recent New Year’s Day attacks by military personnel highlight the ongoing threat of radicalization and distress in the armed forces.

Despite a report recommending counter-extremism measures, its policies were never implemented, facing backlash from right-wing figures, including Trump’s defense secretary nominee, Pete Hegseth.

As Hegseth aims to dismantle counter-extremism programs, Garrison stresses the risks of neglecting the issue, citing cultural and mental health challenges within the military.

  • GrammarPolice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Believing things to be good like environmental regulation, universal health care, civil rights, or even in BLM is not extreme when they seek to undo or prevent objective harm and injustice.

    I think there might have been a misunderstanding. When I mentioned left-wing extremism, I was referring specifically to ideologies like communism and their historical tendencies toward authoritarianism—not to more moderate left-wing policies like universal health care or civil rights, which I agree aren’t extreme. My point was that extremism, whether left or right, often leads to authoritarian outcomes

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Then you should have expended the time to nuance your position rather than making an appeal to hypocrisy argument and wasting your and everyone else’s time. However, your argumentative follow up responses don’t really do your claim of “misunderstanding” any favors.

        • leftytighty@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          here’s the kicker: you’re still wrong even with your clarification.

          Left wing extremists are the likes of anarchists and Black Panthers, people fighting for equality and justice for all. Authoritarianism is a different and separate axis from the social and economic axes.

          Let wing extremism is self organization and community building, left wing extremism is protecting marginalized groups.

          I already said I’m not here to educate you so I’ll leave it at that, but clearly you’re trying to give yourself a pass here. You weren’t misunderstood, you’re just still wrong.

          • GrammarPolice@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            Oh i think i understand what you’re getting at now and i think we might end up being on the same page. I also prefer to use the political compass model. I was using the typical left-right spectrum as only a matter of simplicity, which is why i said left wing extremism can also be authoritarianism and not is always authoritarianism.

            This isn’t to say that communism is always authoritarian, but it depends on the ideology of the individual and how it’s implemented.

            I guess it would be better to say some authoritarian extreme left-wing ideologies are Stalinism and Maoism.

            • leftytighty@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              4 hours ago

              I am willing to meet in the middle and leave it at that with the principle of charity in mind. My passion comes from how broken the overton window is right now and how people conflate “liberal” and “left-wing” as being one and the same. In some contexts that’s true, but as someone who generally dislikes liberals just as much as the average conservative, I find it offensive.

              This is made worse by how conservative and far-right people are often responding to real problems with liberalism (and I’m including capitalism as a liberal ideology) but end up in emotional and reactionary right-populist positions because of leftist erasure.

              Editing to add: the above isn’t meant to suggest you did that, I’d categorize it as conflating authoritarianism and communism instead, but that whole political context I’m describing applies: saying leftists are the same as fascists is erasure and ignorance at best and propaganda at worst. It enables people to think that liberals are the only alternative to fascists.

                • leftytighty@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  I do still encourage you to reflect on the definitions and histories of some of these ideas, capitalism vs. markets vs. money vs. trade, communism vs. socialism vs. anarchism vs. liberalism, and so forth. No longer to suggest that you’re willfully ignorant, but just because even as someone who has done a lot to wrap my head around these I still have a ways to go and so maybe you do too.

                  Communism and socialism aren’t bad words and their true meanings should be respected and communicated in these politically charged times, and we must fight disinformation that benefits the two currently ruling ideologies of neoliberalism and fascism.

                  • GrammarPolice@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    3 hours ago

                    Yes, i will admit I’m still an amateur when it comes to this stuff. The numerous terminologies and jargon don’t do much to make the process easier. Can you recommend any resources that helped you wrap your head around this stuff?