For example, I’m using Debian, and I think we could learn a thing or two from Mint about how to make it “friendlier” for new users. I often see Mint recommended to new users, but rarely Debian, which has a goal to be “the universal operating system”.
I also think we could learn website design from… looks at notes …everyone else.

  • dan@upvote.au
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 months ago

    the entire package system shits itself

    Usually just the one package fails, unless you have other packages that have a dependency on it. I agree that it’s annoying though.

      • Oisteink@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        I might be a special case as I Mostly use Linux for servers. But I have maybe experienced one such case on the last three years on our 50-odd servers

        • IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I’ve ran into that with one shitty vendor (I won’t/can’t give any details beyond this) lately. They ‘support’ deb-based distributions, but specially their postinst-scripts don’t have any kind of testing/verification on the environment they’re running in and it seems to find new and exiting ways to break every now and then. I’m experienced (or old) enough with Linux/Debian that I can go around the loopholes they’ve left behind, but in our company there’s not too many others who have sufficient knowledge on how deb-packages work.

          And they even either are dumb or play one when they claim that their packages work as advertised even after I sent them their postinst-scripts from the package, including explanations on why this and that breaks on a system which doesn’t have graphical environment installed (among other things).

          But that’s absolutely fault on the vendor side, not Debian/Linux itself. But it happens.