• Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      its not exactly for the positive reason you think. theyre trying to prevent the class action lawsuit going around the (UK?) right now and realized when a certain amount of people take the arbitration, it gets fairly costly, so they reverted on that clause.

      regardless fuck arbitration, its like paying off judges but even more transparent about it.

      its basically doing the right thing for the wrong reason (reverting arbitration cause not for thr consumer, but for their wallets)

      • umami_wasabi@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Still, the effects benefits the consumer, so I would consider this a good thing.

        Also, I wonder if we can do the same to other companies and let them revert course.

        • Stovetop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Definitely not a Valve W though.

          I have no idea how some people can worship a corporation so strongly.