This is ridiclous

  • edwardbear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    I… uh… I know it’s going to be an unpopular opinion, but it makes sense. It’s not intended for daily usage - macs wake up on a keyboard or cursor movement. Sitting on the back increases the chance of accidental presses when you are trying to plug something in.

    You have a very few specific incidents where you would need to press the power button. 80% of their user base will not use the power button after the first initial press.

  • Chloé 🥕@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    okay, I was gonna say that it’s not that big of a deal because you can just slightly lift it when you want to turn it on (or just slide your finder under it, if they’re small enough) but judging by that photo, it seems like the power button is at the back of the computer? whyyyy??

    anyways, im more impressed by the fact that their new shiny mouse who finally uses USB-C still has the charging port at the bottom. im starting to think they think it’s a good design???

    • Mad_Punda@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      I read someone else musing that they must have thought that keeping it plugged in all the time would be bad, so the made it impossible to use the mouse while plugged in. Seems plausible. I suppose it would degrade the battery? Or the cord drag would be bad?

      • TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        The design forces the user to use it wirelessly. Apple just wants their products to look better, meaning NO CORDS EVER. It’s entirely about aesthetic.

            • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              17 days ago

              Apparently Logitech does have this out now, so I wonder if they patented the “concept” and it will be another 20 years before anyone can do it. Assuming that someone else didn’t already do it 20 years ago and that patented already ran out.

              • TwanHE@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                17 days ago

                Ive seen one at least 10 years ago already. But that didn’t exactly charge the mouse, instead the mouse relied on always being on the pad to work.

                • Anivia@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  16 days ago

                  That’s not true. It charges very slowly, about 12 hours to charge a completely dead battery, but it does charge

                  The bigger problem is that it’s expensive af, and since current gen Logitech mice have months of battery life and charge in an hour with the usb cord it’s really pointless.