• GingaNinga@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    I feel like bees are a bit of a grey area. We’re not eating them, we’re kind of like landlords that give them a nice place to stay and they pay rent in honey. I’m not vegan so I’m not quite sure what the rationale is for bee stuff.

    • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      27 days ago

      One of my best friends is vegan. They won’t use anything that comes from animals. Nothing. That includes wool, even though the sheep is harmed in the process. They’re absolutely opposed to any animal products or bi-products.

    • multifariace@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      I find vegan intellect fascinating. I love hearing their responses to my epistomology. They all make it up as they go along. It’s very similar to religious beliefs in the way it is personal. Each has their own set beliefs on where to draw the line of what is vegan and what is not.

      My personal understanding of the world is that plants aren’t so different from animals that they can be classified separately from other food sources. For example, how much different is r-selected reproduction from a fruiting plant. Plants react differently to different colors of light and so do we.

      It helps to understand the goal of a vegan. The extent to which we are tied to every living thing on Earth means that many vegans have set impossible goals.

      Just fascinating.

      • ebc@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        28 days ago

        I’ve always wondered if vegetables from a farm that uses horse-drawn tills instead of tractors would be vegan… It’s a real question, but everyone I ask thinks that I’m trolling.

        • Firestorm Druid@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          27 days ago

          I’d say no because horses can’t consent to being used for this. Horse riding is generally not considered vegan either

  • Angel Mountain@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    27 days ago

    Stupid discussion. It does not matter whether something is in the box “vegan”. Ask yourself why you would or would not eat something. If you don’t want to eat(/drink) dairy because of the way the animals that produce the dairy are treated, would you be ok when they are treated differently? Are bees treated in the same way? Does it matter if you treat them in this way? Those should be your questions, not “does it belong in this box?”.

    • AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      Animal ethics isn’t just about whether other animals are being harmed or killed, it’s also about being against exploitation. They might not be able to think in quite the same way that we do, but it’s still clear that they have their own wills and lives of their own that they want to live. It’s worth asking ourselves if we really want a society that’s willing to exploit and turn other thinking beings into commodities, even the ones whose thinking appears to be so much more rudimentary than our own.

      It’s easy to dismiss them because they’re “just bugs”, but presently bugs of all species are facing radical population declines with all the ecological instability - maybe even looming collapse - that brings. Maybe we collectively might be more willing to protect bug populations and do more to protect our environments if more of us stopped to analyze our anti-bug bias and considered that they have a natural right to life like we do. The planet does not exist solely for us.

      Also, honey is essentially a refined sugar that’s no better healthwise than table sugar. Date sugar/powder is a sweetener made of whole fruit and is a much better choice. Plus, it’s just weird to want to eat the vomit of other species anyway.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        27 days ago

        As for the exploitation, all living things have their own lives. Even plants seem to be able to communicate to some degree and can be stressed and stuff. Either you’re OK exploiting living things to some degree or you die. The level of exploitation is what should be discussed. Is beekeeping harmful to bees? I don’t know, but it doesn’t seem like it.

        As for it being sugar, sure. Sugar isn’t bad though. Sugar is bad when consumed in the quantities the average American consumes it. It also has other properties that make it pretty good for your health. For example, I think it’s good for preventing allergies because it contains pollen (I might be making this up, but it seems like I’ve read that somewhere).

        Plus, it’s just weird to want to eat the vomit of other species anyway.

        Do you realize that fruit is the ovary of a plant? Life is weird. Get over it. Weird is not a word that should come into a discussion of ethics.

        • AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          27 days ago

          The “what about plants” argument is such a thoroughly debunked joke argument that it’s amazing anyone would continue to make it. Eating animals and their secretions requires harming significantly more plants than eating the plants directly because animals need to be fed too, and animals as food is by far the least efficient and most environmentally destructive way to have a food system.

          • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            27 days ago

            Not with bees not.

            Eating plant based sugar will kill and harm more animals that bee produced sugar.

            Or do you think that agricultural process does not kill bugs?

            I would argue that eating honey instead of plant based sugar would be more vegan.

            In general drawing the line of veganism with bugs is… Complicated. As you really cannot have agriculture without killing bugs.

            You need pesticides, or some form of plage control. You need to harvest plants that surely will have animals in them. And you’ll need to clean the vegetables of bugs before consumption.

            • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              27 days ago

              The answer they gave is the gotcha answer. The real answer is that vegans currently don’t consider plants worth moral consideration. Its a non-issue, although I’m sure you could find some vegans who are concerned they are harming plants.

              To put it another way, you can harm a plant as much as you can harm a rock. Of course our understanding might change as time goes on.

      • Comment105@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        27 days ago

        Honey, the food of the gods by ancient opinion, is suddenly weird?

        I will never like vegans.

        • AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          27 days ago

          Context matters. In the ancient world starvation was a constant threat, so a source of concentrated calories like honey could in some cases be a matter of life and death despite the dangers of getting that honey. In industrial society we have in many cases the opposite problem - the majority of the top causes of death are lifestyle diseases which ultimately come down to overconsumption and sedentary lifestyles. Too much dietary fat, especially too much saturated fats, too much sugar, too much refined foods, too much concentrated calories, too much easily consumed liquid calories.

          By contrast vegans by far have the easiest time maintaining balanced bodyweight levels.

          If you all could learn to let go of your prejudice you might learn to recognize that doing the right things for animal’s rights is also some of the best things you could do for yourself. These “vegans” you hate so much are just trying to get you to stop self-harming.

          • Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            27 days ago

            I think they’re making a comment on the way vegans communicate their worldview to others, not necessarily a fixation on honey.

            There’s also an argument that diet should contribute to thriving, not simply existing in the most convenient way to balance bodyweight.

            If your goal is to build strength and muscle, an all vegan diet will be less effective than supplementing a similar diet with animal proteins. Every few years, a top contact sport athlete will give a full vegan diet a go, but they invariably fall back on animal protein because they can’t build the mass required.

            Ultimately, it’s all individual choice and body chemistry.

          • Comment105@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            27 days ago

            I’ve come to understand that the healthiest people aren’t vegans.

            It’s just that despite often lacking certain nutrients, vegan diets tend to enforce being at least kind of healthy unless you go ridiculously overboard on fruit or vegan junkfood.

            But eating beef/honey/eggs being “self-harming”? Fuck you very much.

            I am completely disinterested in your arguments, and will continue buying ridiculously good foods from abusive sources. Sources that I’d prefer to regulate in terms of animal rights, but every time that comes up, you people divert the conversation to “if you’re not gonna be vegan you’re evil either way so it doesn’t matter” and everyone tunes out.

            • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              27 days ago

              Sources that I’d prefer to regulate in terms of animal rights, but every time that comes up, you people divert the conversation to “if you’re not gonna be vegan you’re evil either way so it doesn’t matter” and everyone tunes out.

              Pack it up, vegans. This person was going to wish upon a star to regulate animal agriculture, which would’ve done it, but we just had to go and advocate for making material changes on a level we have control over, and that forced them to be explicitly fine with abuse. If only we had your thoughts and prayers, what a horrible miscalculation on our part.

              • Sunshine (she/her)@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                11 hours ago

                This person is going to blame governments and corporations for animal agriculture abuse then do absolutely nothing to stop the cruel system.

              • Comment105@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                27 days ago

                Thoughts and prayers? No. Fines. Potentially jailtime. Potentially forcing them to sell farms and factories.

                But you do not want it. You’re delusional and thinking the animals will just have to endure for a little while longer while you’re working on getting the entire planet to switch to a vegan diet.

                Besides, you need the worst cases to stay around.

                You need to film conversion content, and it’ll have to be fresh and gruesome content to be effective.

                • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  27 days ago

                  Thoughts and prayers? No. Fines. Potentially jailtime. Potentially forcing them to sell farms and factories.

                  And how do you intend to implement those things? Thoughts and prayers.