Inspired by a comment on my last post.

I feel like I never have a solution that allows me to control it while also being automated to such a degree that I don’t have a huge confusing backup if I don’t do finances for days or weeks.

  • tburkhol@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    16 days ago

    This won’t help you, but I want to brag. I started using Quicken to track my finances at the turn of the century, back when it was all local storage. Quicken 2012 was the last iteration that used http (not https) to update stock prices. When they discontinued support, I captured the interaction and deciphered the formats. Wrote a proxy to intercept the request, look up the security info, and send back the data.

    So, I self-host quicken.com. It’s saved me having to update Quicken or submit to their subscription model.

      • tburkhol@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        16 days ago

        Super easy, as it turns out. I run my own DNS and web servers, so I pointed quicken.com at my web server to capture the request, then used curl to capture the response. Both turned out to be plain ASCII, request like

        stk.1=SMCI;.2=NVDA;.3=INTC;

        as POST data, and responses like

        qwin.quotes.ASTM.symbol 4 ASTM
        .last 7 18.7400
        .time 10 1573074000
        .time.str 5 16:00
        .change 6 0.4000

        plus a whole slew of other optional fields for fundamentals, dividends, etc. It was a simpler time on the internet, when no one cared about leaking data and companies didn’t care if a handful of geeks reversed engineered their data structures.

      • neinhorn@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        16 days ago

        He mentioned it used http, so the traffic is not encrypted. You can easily monitor http traffic with wireshark.

          • borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            16 days ago

            It is pretty easy. There’s tons of tutorials and walkthroughs for doing it, but anyone familiar with UIs will be able to work it out pretty quickly I think. Maybe a friction point in using the filter query, but again there’s tons of walkthroughs and guides for using it online.

            If you can’t conceptualize a packet, or sockets, or network flows, even with the help of online guides/manuals, I guess it wouldn’t be easy. In that case I’d be wondering why someone would want to use those tools in the first place though, as then they probably wouldn’t have the skills necessary to leverage the information gleaned from the tool in any useful way.

            Edit - As we’re in the self-hosted community, I’d argue that anyone who is self-hosting anything would probably be able to easily install wireshark and view http requests, both individual packets and the stream as a whole.

  • Panda@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    16 days ago

    I use Actual. How it works is very similar to YNAB (you budget the money you currently have) but it’s open source and privacy focused. I started using it a few months ago and I really like it so far!

    • Yingwu@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 days ago

      I love Actual. So, so good. I cancelled YNAB in favor and can’t ever think of going back. Aside from not having to pay $100 a year you’re also not supporting the Mormon Church (YNAB is a Mormon-run company).

      • jg1i@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        Do you just use a limit set of YNAB features? It seems like Actual only has a tiny fraction of the features YNAB has. For example, it’s currently missing category targets.

    • dmtalon@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      16 days ago

      I switched over to Actual last month, and am not looking back. I will miss the native android app, but it is an otherwise direct replacement. I was using YNAB4, and had forever.

    • jg1i@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 days ago

      Is there some tutorial you’d recommend to get started? I didn’t find the docs or demo helpful and a lot of videos seem to be focused on background or setup. I can install the app fine, but like how does one actually use this?

      I’ve never used budgeting apps. I’d like to learn more about them and why they’re useful. My current budgeting is: positive balance=good; negative balance=bad

        • jg1i@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          That link kinda showcases exactly my point… It’s pretty useless to me. I know how to install the app. I don’t know what the daily workflow looks like.

          Compare that to the tutorials YNAB has on YouTube. Those talk more about how to use the app to budget.

          Anyway, it’s fine. I understand I’m not the target audience for Actual. It seems like it’s for people who already have prior experience with finance apps.

          • geography082@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 days ago

            Hehehe hold on. Just try it and fins your own way to use it. You never know what you can find out. I can give you my experience, my only past experience was with Excel files to control my spending. It was pretty enough to be honest , at first when tried this app I was like ok why I need to do all this job of put every spending … Then after two month I realized that mechanical doing so made more aware of my day by day spending and my month budget became better. It’s just that, helps to be aware of what you are doing every months and it feels good filling it every 2 or 3 days. And also having all visualized and granular of were are doing it wrong or what can be adjusted is excellent .

      • jg1i@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        As a note for people new to budgeting apps, YNAB has a toooonnn of tutorials and videos about how to create a budget and what the end-to-end workflow looks like in their apps.

    • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      16 days ago

      I’ve never seen this recommended before and I’ve looked for years for self hosted alternatives to YNAB.

        • borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          16 days ago

          Damn. You’ve given me a vision of a future where people call applications that are installed locally and don’t leverage any cloud/server backend for any functionality “self-hosted” programs and I hate it.

  • redxef@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    16 days ago

    I have Firefly III and am really quiet happy with it. I might write a companion program to scan bill though, since doing everything by hand is rather time consuming.

      • redxef@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        Yes, but it’s incompatible with the way I handle access control. I think I did it with Remote User authentication, which breaks all the login mechanisms of diverse apps, even though it’s officially supported by the projects. That’s why I only choose projects where the frontend is a PWA or they support oidc.

        So I just installed the PWA, which works great.

  • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    16 days ago

    Actual Budget, because it supports SimpleFIN to import my transactions.

    It’s still not “automated,” but I have a lot of rules now so it’s getting there.

    I’m not super happy w/ how it works, but I’m too lazy to do anything about it. Maybe I’ll end up adding SimpleFIN to something else, idk.

  • humble peat digger@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    16 days ago

    I don’t understand why isn’t crypto banned yet.

    Its a dumb drain on world resources and only facilitates of untraceable payments for drug sales and tax avoidance.

    • roofuskit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      16 days ago

      Because the rich people of the world are at the top of that pump and dump pyramid and stand to extract a lot of money from the suckers of the world.

    • ililiililiililiilili@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      16 days ago

      Crypto cannot be banned. It can only be made illegal, if countries want to remove themselves from the digital currency revolution. The derivatives market is $730T. Stocks are about $110T. Real estate is around $380T. If you’re concerned about the minuscule amount of illegal activities that occur within the 3.5T crypto market, your fears are misguided. Crypto is mostly traceable. Fiat currencies are highly preferred for drug sales and tax avoidance.

      • humble peat digger@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        16 days ago

        Make it illegal, drive it underground where it belongs.
        I’m concerned about traceability and tax avoidance. I’m concerned about energy consumption I’m concerned about gpu prices

        • ililiililiililiilili@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 days ago

          Are you just as concerned that cash is not traceable and that some is exchanged tax free? I don’t see how any GPU miners are profitable at this point. Outside of gaming: AI must have a larger GPU demand? Most miners are using ASICs. You’re absolutely right that mining energy should come from plants that have underutilized capacity and (obviously) renewable sources. The cat’s out of the bag on cryptocurrency and unjust laws don’t deserve to be followed. All government printed currencies eventually become worthless.

      • humble peat digger@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        16 days ago

        I’m old enough to know that governments should care about taxes and payment traceability.
        This is what funds the social programs such as healthcare and education.

        And if government doesn’t give a fuck - there is only one explanation, it’s beholden to the corporate overloads that want to capitalize on the crypto action - which is not in my best interests as a private citizen.

        Also - all it does it raises energy prices for me and makes GPUs more expensive for me.

        Why should I support that?

        Fuck crypto and fuck the government that’s doesn’t do anything about it.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          16 days ago

          I’m old enough to know that governments should care about taxes and payment traceability.

          And cryptocurrencies (esp. the bigger ones) are perhaps the most traceable store of value and is highly regulated. At least in the US, cryptocurrencies are regulated like stocks, so any transaction needs to be properly reported as either a capital gain or loss or you’ll run afoul of the IRS.

          Also - all it does it raises energy prices for me and makes GPUs more expensive for me.

          It really doesn’t. Crypto mining is only profitable if energy prices are very low, especially if you do it at any kind of scale. Crypto mining in the US is estimated at 0.6-2.3% of total energy use, which is a drop in the bucket.

          And mining on GPUs isn’t very profitable, with profitability timelines at ~3 years assuming a very low energy cost of $0.10/kWh. So it’s not really a good option. The big miners have pretty much all moved to ASICs, which won’t impact your GPU prices at all, so the only ones buying GPUs for mining are hobbyists, which are a pretty small market.

          Why should I support that?

          There are a lot of good reasons to support cryptocurrencies, such as:

          • low cost international transactions - sending to my neighbor and sending across the world costs exactly the same
          • essential for people like journalists and minorities in repressive areas - this is also why you should support Tor
          • many parts of the world don’t have stable money, and crypto is easier to access and store than foreign currencies (like USD or Euro)
          • not impacted by inflation, so theoretically they can be a cash alternative to other inflation hedges like gold; fluctuation is a bit of a problem ATM though
          • sidesteps the massive payment networks like Mastercard and Visa, who charge something like 3% of every transaction; many cryptocurrencies have lower transaction costs

          I think there are a lot of good reasons to support cryptocurrencies for everyday transactions, I don’t see much point in supporting it as an investment option. So if a vendor supports transactions in cryptocurrencies, I’ll go out of my way to pay w/ crypto, but I’m not interested in trading cryptocurrencies as an investment.

  • Boomkop3@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    16 days ago

    My bank does this for me, but I do like self hosting things. Where’s the benefit in this apart from a fun project?

    • Christian@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      16 days ago

      If you only have one Bank (Account) it is maybe fine.

      But if you have multiple accounts (I have 4 Bank accounts for savings and another one for my shares), you would like to have one software/application to handle it. Like the one email client for your different email accounts.

      • Boomkop3@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 days ago

        Ah that makes sense. Right now I have one account, but it has multiple cards and pools of money under it (for lack of a better word).

        So for me this is still easily managed, even with four bank accounts and about nine sub-pools under them collectively.

        I guess I just got very lucky with the bank I’ve kinda stuck with just because it’s what my mom got me over a decade ago.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 days ago

        Yup, I have a ridiculous amount (like 8? bank accounts and 15? credit cards), so having something that automatically pulls in transactions is nice.

        That said, my main “bank” is a Fidelity brokerage, so I don’t really need those other bank accounts to sync since they mostly exist for temporary transactions, such as Zelle and cash transactions (Fidelity doesn’t support those) and transfers for bank account bonuses (I net a >$2k/year on that). And for credit cards, I mostly use 1-2 credit cards these days, the rest are mostly for signup bonuses.

        So for me, the $1.50/month is totally worth it to keep track of all that nonsense. If I only had 3-4 accounts, I’d probably use something like GNUCash instead, but I have >20, and I will for the foreseeable future.

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            16 days ago

            I mentioned it, but mostly signups bonuses.

            For example, here are a few checking accounts I did recently:

            • US Bank - $450
            • Citi - $325
            • Wells Fargo - $325

            I’ve closed Citi, but I’m keeping the others open for a bit before closing (branches are convenient for depositing checks around the holidays).

            Likewise for credit cards, here are some I’ve done recently:

            • Bank of America Premium Rewards - ~$500 net after the annual fee - this is straight cash
            • US Bank Altitude Reserve - ~$650 net after annual fee; a little more complicated because i need to redeem for travel
            • Wells Fargo Active Cash - $200 straight cash

            I actually use 2 banks (Fidelity brokerage for main, and US Bank for cash and zelle) and usually two credit cards (US Bank Altitude Reserve and some 2% card; was my Costco card and Citi double cash before I got the US Bank card). However, I have some category bonus cards I rotate in every so often, such as my Discover card, which is 5% at Amazon and Target through the end of the year.

            Anyway, since I have so many accounts, I need something to keep track of them so I don’t pay maintenance fees or miss a payment or something.

            It sounds complicated, but I’ve automated pretty much everything, so I just check in every couple months or so. And I think it’s worth the hassle because I make thousands every year on it.

    • Engywuck@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 days ago

      Indeed. My bank surely does this better than I could ever do. But if it’s “for fun”, then it’s fine.

  • bolapara@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    16 days ago

    I use hledger mostly because of the plain text format. I came from YNAB as well but I just hated how you couldn’t easily undo changes or see when you made a change, etc. This is so easily to track changes and you can add comments explaining your reasoning around things and you can keep everything in source control so you have all the power of that as well. Not for everyone but if you’re a programmer or just comfortable on the command line it’s great.

  • abeorch@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    16 days ago

    Id love to find a #creditunion that supported #openbanking and offered API access to my data so I could easily download it and use it with Actual or FireflyIII. I think working with a credit union to build this feature would be a great open source project.

  • linuxguy@lemmy.gregw.us
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    16 days ago

    Gnucash books split for personal, joint, and business with a mysql backend. I wrote a read-only web frontend for wife and OTG access. Sadly no automation so I just stay on top of it.

  • mbirth@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    16 days ago

    I’m waiting for Actual to support multiple currencies. Until then, as an Apple user, I’m using iFinance which works on all my platforms.

  • HotChickenFeet@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    16 days ago

    I use GnuCash. I typically update every couple weeks up to a month. Beyond that it can be hard to remember what specific transactions were.

    It’s double ledger and I really like that it forces strict accounting. That sounds cumbersome but once you’re set up (it may take some trial and error), for me my workflow is essentially:

    • Copy prior paycheck splits & update them to reflect new paychecks.
    • export QFX files from credit cards
    • import QFX, check / set transaction accounts
    • any small manual updates (interest payments in accounts, etc)

    It’s not automated but my data always remains local, and I can use the Linux or android application. I don’t bother daily tracking on my phone, else it might be cumbersome. I’ve never used any of the budget features, just tracking where my money comes and goes.

    • Cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      16 days ago

      Weird question, but what does GnuCash do that you wouldn’t get easily from excel? I haven’t used any of these apps and wondering what I’m missing out on.

      • HotChickenFeet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 days ago

        Under the hood its mostly tables and reports, so ultimately not much, if you were dedicated enough to using Excel to rebuild GnuCash’s views. It’s more streamlined than excel would be because you won’t have to worry about implementation, overhead of adding a new account, etc. Some things like auto-recommending accounts during import (and import itself) could be arduous in excel if not supported natively. Split transactions could be a headache (think your paycheck, which might be split into 401k contributions, several taxes, money into your bank, etc).

        But fully recreating it in excel when it already exists would be a headache. More than likely you will have a more limited view in Excel if you’re just creating a handful of tables to represent all of your many accounts.