It’s a way to skip Google and search right on Reddit.

Reddit Answers uses AI to answer your questions with summarized information from across the platform.

An image showing the Reddit logo on a red and white background

Reddit is launching a new AI-powered search tool called Reddit Answers to help you more easily find information on the platform. The tool, similar to other AI search products, responds to queries by generating well-formatted responses and showing links to its sources.

But the distinction with Reddit Answers is that it sources things directly from Reddit, which means it could be a way to skip Google and get information directly from the source. Reddit has already been cracking down on where you can search for things from Reddit, and Google is the only major search engine that shows recent Reddit results. But Reddit probably would prefer if you did searches right on its platform, and Reddit Answers might prove to be a good way to do so.

Reddit Answers will initially roll out to “a limited number of users” in the US and in English, and it will be available on the web (not on Old Reddit) and iOS. (“We’re working on Android as we speak,” Serkan Piantino, Reddit’s VP of product, said in an interview.) Reddit plans to bring the tool to more languages and locations “in the future,” according to a blog post.

Reddit gave me access to a test version of Reddit Answers, and while I haven’t been able to mess around with it very much, I’ve liked what I’ve seen. There’s a big box to ask a query, but the initial Reddit Answers page also floats a bunch of suggested searches you can click on, like “favorite Nintendo character of all time,” “best mystery novels of 2025,” and “tips for flying with a baby for the first time.”

I clicked that last one, and the tool quickly pulled together a list and some bulleted suggestions with hyperlinks on the text and an arrow to click to see the source of the information. When you click either, a sidebar pops up showing the exact post where the information comes from.

An example results page for Reddit Answers.

This is from a test version of Reddit Answers, so things might look a tad different when you try it. But you can get the gist.

A Reddit site search for the same query on Google, on the other hand, just gave me a standard long list of links to evaluate and click through. On its face, Google’s version, which doesn’t have the summaries or bullet points, isn’t as immediately informative as Reddit Answers. But personally, I’m pretty skeptical of AI summaries anyway — they can make some pretty bad errors! — so for me, the Google results are still perfectly fine as a way to explore some potentially useful posts on Reddit.

A screenshot of a Google search for “site:reddit.com + tips for flying with a baby for the first time”

My Reddit site search on Google.

Reddit Answers can also pick up on things happening on Reddit within minutes, according to spokesperson Tim Rathschmidt, so there’s also a chance responses to your queries will have timely results. I haven’t had much luck with that; on Friday, for example, I asked “who won yesterday’s NFL game,” and instead of pulling up answers about Thursday’s Packers-Lions game, it included details on the Eagles-Ravens game that happened on December 1st.

That might have just been a quirk of the product not being fully ready yet. In my testing, though, Reddit Answers has been much more useful as a jumping off point to dig into a more general topic on Reddit rather than an up-to-the-minute s

  • akkajdh999@programming.devEnglish
    37·
    17 days ago

    When I search for reddit answers, I want concrete, distinct, maybe wrong, opinions from humans, together with discussions. Not summarized bullshit.

    • cheese_greater@lemmy.worldEnglish
      6·
      17 days ago

      Would be interesting to see a similated AI version of the adversarial machine learning thing approximating that tho.

      Honestly, as much as i love getting an answer I love it infinitely more when nobody has the 100% correct answer but the discourse leads you to it by intertextually synthesizing it yourself

  • umami_wasabi@lemmy.mlEnglish
    10·
    17 days ago

    IMO the correct use of AI in searches is keyword correction and suggestion, like a beefed up version of “do you mean”.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
      2·
      16 days ago

      One of the few AI applications I’ve seen that I haven’t completely hated, is Amazon’s AI summary of product reviews. Of course, you have to take it with a grain of salt, because while it will mention negatives every now and then, I’m sure it cannot be completely trusted.

  • small44@lemmy.worldEnglish
    9·
    17 days ago

    I tried multiple search ai engine. They are all terrible with lot of hallucinations and inaccurate information

        • nocturne@sopuli.xyzEnglish
          3·
          17 days ago

          I have yet to see anything positive from AI yet. I think it is a waste of time and resources.

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
            1·
            17 days ago

            I’m still waiting for that killer app too. That doesn’t mean the whole idea is a waste of time, it means it’s new and hasn’t really found it’s niche outside a few novelties.

            • nocturne@sopuli.xyzEnglish
              2·
              16 days ago

              With all of the resources that AI consumes I am willing to have mundane apps with zero AI involvement.

              • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
                2·
                16 days ago

                Would you have said the same about early computers, when they were less effective at solving problems than a human?

                The problem isn’t AI, but the crazy investment into hype, which results in companies forcing it where it doesn’t belong. Total energy use of data centers (not just AI, all data centers, meaning pretty much every website) is about 1% of global electricity, which is about half the energy use of home electronics. I don’t know what share of that is AI, but I would be surprised if it’s even half of the data center usage.

                Yeah, it’s wasteful now, but just like early computers, it has the potential of being very effective. Some areas I’m interested in are medical diagnosis and improving accessibility of technical documentation. Doctors and nurses already use algorithms for diagnosis ie. flowcharts), and studies indicate that they make medical professionals more effective, and AI can add to that. I don’t think it’s nearly as useful for the average person especially due to the hallucination problem, but targeting non-experts can help refine things for experts.

                I also generally avoid AI because I’m concerned about not catching hallucinations on things I’m unfamiliar with, and wasting time on correcting things on things I am familiar with. However, I see promise in it, so I’m interested in following developments in the field.

                • nocturne@sopuli.xyzEnglish
                  1·
                  16 days ago

                  Would you have said the same about early computers

                  If we were in a worldwide drought with temperatures increasing to record levels with increasingly violent storms, yes. We need to scale back on power and water consumption, not increase it.

  • Ebby@lemmy.ssba.comEnglish
    6·
    17 days ago

    Google reeeeally thrilled at handing over $60,000,000 licensing reddit content for search now.

    Lmao.