• Kichae@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not explicitly, maybe, but implicitly, absolutely, and in multiple ways:

      • Supporting the system that creates one over the other
      • Having ‘bootstrap’ attitudes about the poor
      • Worrying about property value over utilization
      • Complaining about the homeless rather than the lack of action on housing
      • Voting against people who run on public housing

      In so, so many ways, people say they prefer the latter over the former. Usually just with the caveat that the homeless people also be invisible.

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The world will never recover until poverty is seen not as a character flaw, but as a failure of society itself to provide for the most vulnerable.

    • Daft_ish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They wouldn’t be vulnerable if they just overcame their own biology and lifetime of trauma. Its that simple, they arent trying hard enough.

        • cooopsspace@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Literally people born with or contracting disabilities that leave them permanently destitute due to you not being able to eat or house yourself without work you can’t do because your disabled.

  • spread@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I hate how when there is any picture of Soviet blocks it’s always shot in autumn or winter when it’s overcast. I live in an ex Soviet country and when these bad boys are maintained they can outperform new apartments, be it in functionality, amenities or price.

    • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Literally though. And there’s a whole practice of hostile architecture that makes it harder and more uncomfortable to be homeless.

      • Obi@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        The point of hostile architecture isn’t to solve homelessness, just to send them to the next block/town over (not saying you don’t understand that, just pointing it out).

        • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I wonder if hostile architecture also kills people. Increasing exposure to cold and reducing opportunities to rest doesn’t seem good for your chances for survival. I guess that would solve homelessness, but in the worst most morbid way possible.

          • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You’re absolutely right in your suspicion. Like so many “let’s punish the poor and vulnerable so they’ll stop being poor and vulnerable” policies that people think are just a “righteous” inconvenience, hostile architecture DOES kill people.

            It’s social murder just so the more fortunate don’t have to look at the consequences of an unjust system.