![](/static/be9a2c79/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/a64z2tlDDD.png)
I think the option was single file or whole folder.
I think the option was single file or whole folder.
Why one at a time? Just load a folder and apply the same settings to all of them. If the settings are different per file… not sure which method would be less annoying.
Then why can we apply video filters etc. if it is only for transcoding? That is a really basic thing. Like no audio or pass through. You can also add subtitles. Why not audio?
Only downside is that they do not want to add features, simple stuff like replacing the audio. But otherwise yes, go to solution
Why? I have done ~100 files in one batch with no issue?
as they’re robust
I would argue they are just what was used during development. After that, it never changes.
Why did they use it back then? Were there many alternatives? I do not know.
Not needed what…?
I agree, if the data loss is no issue and there is no need to recover anything, just start from scratch.
Who was oppressed here?
You are correct! Sorry for mixing this up. I must have looked at research Numbers back in the day and simply used that as my reference now, which of course is then correct if look at research again…
I always remembered then to be somewhat better than those numbers and this paper agrees with me (figure 1). 14 % is not premium (efficiency) for polycrystaline in 2010. Figure 1 shows 20 % for polycrystaline at 2010 and 25 % for single crystal. Thin film, on the other hand, is down there at maybe 15 %.
Are you using thin film cells? That would explain this low value.
What was their job at NYT? What do artists do there? Why do they need so many?
Using Connect, I will have a look! Yes, setting exists, nice!
152 is the sum of the + and -1 votes 82 % were + So 18% were - So 18% of + were canceled from the - So what we see is the remaining 64% positive, which means that 100 % are 237 votes (42 downvotes, 195 upvotes)
To me, the post has 48 upvotes (net positive).
It had 0 when I commented.
I can not see the number of up/down votes, sadly, they copied that flaw from Reddit.
Just have to love that you get downvoted for something so basic. “Nah, the current and past versions were fine!” Like what the fuck?
The color grading of the years is really bad. The last 20/30 years are all very low in contrast compared to each other, while 1940s and 60s are easy to tell apart, where it is least important. There are so many more colors than yellow/orange/brown, we can use them to get more information density.
Just so others do not need to click etc: they found out it was faked and apologize for spreading fake news.
I know, all good, that is just such an odd choice.