Flamekebab

are concerned about […]

No, they’re not.

Ye gods, no wonder it’s so easy to grift people. They’ve got the savvy of a toddler.

I’m often not waiting for ideal conditions, just less bad conditions. This evening I made some progress on something I’ve not been working on because I’ve just been too exhausted, mentally and physically. Conditions don’t have to be ideal, but they’re often more than sub-optimal.

You’d hate my IDE at work. It’s bright pink.

Symlink each individual file, obviously.

Adverts are visual and psychological pollution. Get fucked.

It’s still doing better than Krita - which I had to bail on because its levels tool doesn’t support setting the white point.

Is there a version of this that wasn’t awkwardly resized?

They lost me when they moved to algorithmically-driven rather than chronological. The notion that a feature like this has to be added is mad.

Interesting. That makes sense. Thanks for explaining. It doesn’t appeal to me but I can certainly relate to the frustration of changes breaking established workflow.

Who says that?! I’ll kill them with my power!

That’s what I’m getting at. It’s not that I have no interest, I do, but if it’s too inconvenient it’s a bad fit for me. Much like I don’t make my own shoes, I suppose. If I had infinite time then, sure, but realistically the opportunity cost is too high.

Vulnerabilities found in packages? The maintainers aren’t omniscient.

I think you might be interpreting my comment a little too literally. Perhaps I could instead word it as “I don’t know what the appeal is - to me it doesn’t seem anything other than an oddly archaic OS”. What’s its USP, so to speak?

I had something similar when I tried running SUSE in about 2005. Shortly after I discovered Ubuntu and found that it made package management and maintenance easy and from there I was able to start using the system to get things done. Whilst I don’t currently use Linux on my personal machine, I do use it on my work machine inside WSL2, on servers at work and at home.

I’ve never even entertained the notion that Slackware would be something I might use - because it seems clunky for the sake of clunk. Am I missing something here? Or is the clunk the appeal, like how lots of people like really awful B-movies?

That’s something that I don’t understand. I have a computer to do stuff. Performing maintenance is a necessary evil, not a hobby, at least for me. If I have to do any significant maintenance more frequently than about every three years, it’s too often. Sure, I’ll install updates (usually using a package manager, so the work is a command or two), but this stuff gets in the way of me doing what I turned the machine on for.

It’s much like when I launch a program and it immediately asks me to install updates. Uh, no, I launched you to *do* something, get out of my way! (I’m confused as to why more software doesn’t prompt on close - I love it when they do that!)

I did once try to get started with Slackware when I was a teenager. It was on a cover CD for Linux Format about twenty years ago. I never managed to get it running and gave up on Linux for a while as a result.

I’m a little perplexed as to what it exists for, to be honest.