I’m not saying we should exclude any tools, I’m just skeptical about the trend of calling everything AI, attributing all computational advances to AI, and jumping into the bandwagon of businesses trying to oversell any and all computating as AI.
The very first link shows that this is incremental benefit that’s been taking place since 2010. Computational tools are useful, but you’re providing mostly links of algorithms/learning models to sort pictures for medical purposes and diagnosis (useful and cool), and saying that somehow that means fusion will be solved by AI
Please give me the examples
So, are there any results of technological achievements from any AI models that show a trend towards increasing solving of scientific and technical problems?
By fusion, what do you mean?
Germany is already taking the wrong side of history.
Always has been
What other type of current AI claims problem-solving capabilities?
No, I haven’t seen any major technological breakthroughs coming from language models, other than language models themselves. Have you?
Wait, you think fusion will be developed thanks to AI?
[…] is a provocation worthy of military invasion?
See, that’s an entirely different statement. Threatening to join Russia’s geopolitical rival’s military alliance while bordering Russia, is provocation. The acts in Donbas since 2014 are provocation. Is it “worthy of military invasion”? I don’t believe so. The proto-fascist Russian government is clearly not acting entirely out of pure will and self defense, and I’ll be the last to defend it since I have loved ones directly suffering under that government. But it’s important to frame things correctly, and yes, threatening to join NATO while bordering Russia is a huge provocation.
Particularly, NATO has no history of defensiveness (as far as I know it has never intervened for the defensive purposes it’s supposed to uphold), but it has a history of offensiveness. Yugoslavia and Libya can both attest to that, and extra-officially (technically not NATO interventions even if many NATO members participated one way or another), countries such as Iraq can also attest. The case of Iraq is a perfect example of what unprovoked invasion in modern times is, and we are still forced to see libs fall heads over heels for a fucking Dick Satan Cheney endorsement to Kamala “most lethal army in the world” Harris.
So, yes, when a country bordering you chooses to join a historically aggressive military alliance that openly challenges you, that’s huge provocation. And it’s important to state so when we talk about the war in Ukraine.
completely unprovoked
considering joining NATO
Those two statements are in the same phrase… My god
They absolutely don’t both solve the problem, plenty of homeless people in the capitalist world compared to the 0 people in former USSR
Russia’s Putin as opposed to…? Just funny phrasing
A better question then would be “what percentage of people doesn’t conform to your ethnonationalist idea of local”.