• Rustmilian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Men are welcome to do the same whenever they’re ready, but for now a lot of men are just coping by crab bucketing this shit and bringing women back down.

    Stop pretending like you know jack shit about men’s issues.
    It’s only to/about men do you mfs say this type of shit.
    “Oh, men are depressed and have insanely high suicide rate? Have they tried smiling more?”

    Men are welcome to do the same whenever they’re ready

    We’ve been ready for a very long fucking time.
    When will society be ready to actually fucking listen for once?
    It’s fuckin sad that the only people able to talk about men’s issues are either fucking grifters (Andrew you know who) or aren’t even men.
    Just STFU with your copout bullshit.

    • Shampiss@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Hey, what’s up with the tone my guy? Message me if you need to talk fr

      Regarding the subject at hand,

      Evidently women still have many issues coming from male dominant culture formed before the industrial revolution, there has been good progress but there’s still a long path ahead.

      Men have issues coming from cultural norms too. imo the biggest hindrance for men at the moment is not nearly enough people talk about men’s mental health.

      MOST IMPORTANT NOTE IS:

      Promoting solutions for women doesn’t mean ignoring men’s issues.

      Promoting awareness to men’s issues is not against women’s interests.

      When someone is promoting progress, let’s not jump to “there are bigger problems elsewhere”

      If you want to promote change via debate, being aggressive is the worst strategy. Why not say “hey, I hear your argument for women, and on this note I’d also like to raise this other related subject about men’s issues.”

      That’s a win win conversation

      • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        7 months ago

        It is, but there are a ton of people pushing for women’s issues and other currently hot button social topics who are incredibly aggressive themselves, and pretending those people don’t exist, or that it’s okay when pointed at the non-marginalized group is a problem.

        Let’s not pretend that explicit misandry doesn’t exist just because it frequently comes from people hiding behind the shield of championing women’s rights. Let’s not brush off misandry because men aren’t marginalized.

        Go to town about whether or not it’s worse, but I find very often that people want to pretend it simply does not exist.

        Most posts like the one you’re responding to would get a lot of support if it were flipped to be a woman going off on a guy, but generally when things like thay are brought up you get decried for whataboutism.

      • Rustmilian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Hey, what’s up with the tone my guy?

        How else am I supposed to react to a hyper simplification of the multifaceted problem that is men’s issues?

        Evidently women still have many issues coming from male dominant culture formed before the industrial revolution, there has been good progress but there’s still a long path ahead.

        Yes, that’s true.

        Men have issues coming from cultural norms too. imo the biggest hindrance for men at the moment is not nearly enough people talk about men’s mental health.

        True.

        Promoting solutions for women doesn’t mean ignoring men’s issues. Promoting awareness to men’s issues is not against women’s interests.

        Yes. That’s why the most prominent men’s rights activists are also women rights activists.

        When someone is promoting progress, let’s not jump to “there are bigger problems elsewhere”

        That’s not what’s happening here.

        If you want to promote change via debate, being aggressive is the worst strategy. Why not say “hey, I hear your argument for women, and on this note I’d also like to raise this other related subject about men’s issues.”

        The problem is that they brought up men’s rights issues in the most passive aggressive snarky way possible while hyper-generalizing and hypersimplifying it.

        • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          7 months ago

          As a man, I’ll confirm that we have issues, but, most of them are self imposed.

          I could do without toxic masculinity, and the social rules that say we cannot empathize, cannot have emotion, we must eat raw meat and punch each other so we can pick up heavy things and smash even heavier things.

          But, I don’t know who you are crying victim to. Men set these rules for other men, and I can’t really wrap my head around the concept of men asking men to stop taking away the rights of men.

          • Rustmilian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            You’ve miss interpreted my words.
            Nobody is crying victim.
            This is not about weather or not men’s issues are self imposed. It’s about the consistent oversimplification of the multifaceted problem that is men’s issues.

            Men set these rules for other men

            That’s not entirely true. There’s plenty of other factors you’re not taking into account. Fatherlessness, poverty, the lack of men’s mental health infrastructure and funding, the chosen ignorance of domestic violence against men & boys, the hashtag #killallmen trending on Twitter back in May 2014, the sexualization of boys getting molested by women like some how that’s supposed to normal, female SO’s getting categorically lighter sentencing for the same crime, entrenched societal biases, the dismissal or trivialization of issues affecting men and so so much more. Then there’s the intersection of men’s issues with other marginalized identities, such as race, sexuality, and disability, creating additional complexities. Men’s issues are multifaceted and go beyond simplistic narratives like “men hurt men” copout bs.

            and I can’t really wrap my head around the concept of men asking men to stop taking away the rights of men.

            It’s easy once you realize that the problem with the “gender war” is not women vs men, it’s the poor vs the government + the rich.

            Please consider watching :
            Pt.1 & Pt.2 , I know they’re long, but you’ll have a much deeper understanding of my perspective.

            • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              7 months ago

              If it’s poor vs rich, why even mention gender?

              I agree we are all getting fucked by the system. The results of that in my life are different than how it affects your life. The system screws men in a different way than it screws women. It screws black people different than white people. It screws this religion different than that religion.

              It just sounds selfish to me when you acknowledge that the problem is bigger than “Men’s issues”. And although it’s not quite as bad, it reminds me of All Lives Matter.

              Cancer has MANY symptoms. When someone is complaining about how they lost both their legs to cancer, and you’re like “But MY cancer occasionally makes me feel dizzy”, yeah, it sucks that you have cancer, and I wish you didn’t, but trying to equate your dizziness with amputation just makes you sound ignorant and desperate for attention.

              By all means, let’s cure the cancer for everyone, but until we can do that, we should triage, and treat the most severe symptoms before we start worrying about the occasional dizziness.

              • Rustmilian@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                If it’s poor vs rich, why even mention gender?

                Because the gender war is a symptom of poor vs rich + government and is the entire topic of this thread.

                I agree we are all getting fucked by the system. The results of that in my life are different than how it affects your life. The system screws men in a different way than it screws women. It screws black people different than white people. It screws this religion different than that religion.

                Exactly the point. Continuing that line of thought. Do you think, a solution for one group is just going to magically work for another?

                It just sounds selfish to me when you acknowledge that the problem is bigger than “Men’s issues”. And although it’s not quite as bad, it reminds me of All Lives Matter.

                How is this at all related?

                Cancer has MANY symptoms. When someone is complaining about how they lost both their legs to cancer, and you’re like “But MY cancer occasionally makes me feel dizzy”, yeah, it sucks that you have cancer, and I wish you didn’t, but trying to equate your dizziness with amputation just makes you sound ignorant and desperate for attention.
                By all means, let’s cure the cancer for everyone, but until we can do that, we should triage, and treat the most severe symptoms before we start worrying about the occasional dizziness.

                Again you’re misinterpreting, using your cancer analogy, this is like :
                P1 : “I have cancer and made huge strides to beat it, I know you have cancer too, use this and this and do this and this and take theses supplements & drugs, eat this diet, smile more, do this exercise, blah blah blah”
                P2 : “We don’t even have the same type of cancer, you have Rhabdomyoma, I have Leukemia, what you’re suggesting doesn’t work or isn’t nearly as effective, cancer is way more complex than that.”
                P1 : “Fuck you then.”

                Again, Please consider watching :
                Pt.1 & Pt.2 if you want a deeper understanding of my perspective.

                • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 months ago

                  If you’re not going to read and respond to mine, I’m not going to bother watching yours.

                  Best wishes to you.

                  EDIT: Originally the only comment above was reposting the links to the videos. They added a comment after I complained about the lack of one.

                  • Rustmilian@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    7 months ago

                    I’m dyslexic and have reading OCD, it takes me longer to write and development my argument.
                    I read your comment the first time, and as per my OCD, I’ll be reading it again.

        • Shampiss@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          I understand that you’re angry. Sure the initial comment was slightly snarky, and yes, a lot of frustration is caused by a large lack of willingness to address men’s issues.

          But I’d just like you to find out what you want to achieve with your commentary.

          If your objective was to raise an argument and change someone’s mind, then starting a conversation with

          Stop pretending you know jack shit

          And

          STFU about your cope bullshit Will never convince anyone

          If you just wanted to express your anger, then I think it’s unjustified to direct it so intensely to the initial comment. The intensity does not match the casual tone of the comment and it’s uncalled for.

          Maybe you just wanted to spend some idle time by commenting on posts. Sure that’s fair, but considering the stress you put into this I’d say that’s probably a net loss for your mood

          That’s not what’s happening here

          Sorry if I misunderstood that. But your tone did not help with my understanding of your point

          The problem is that they brought up men’s rights issues in the most passive aggressive snarky way

          Sure I agree that the initial comment deserves some correction, but You will never get your point across by insulting someone. often to convince someone you should talk to them like they’re your friend. I know the insults might come more naturally than friendship, but respect is what effectively causes change.

          I’m just suggesting you use your energy and patience more efficiently

          I enjoyed this conversation, and hope you did too. Cheers

          • Rustmilian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            You bring up good points, and you’re right. I acted irrationally out of anger.
            The insensitivity of the way she presented men’s issues… Tbh, it hurt me and it came out as intense anger that clouded my judgement and muddied the point I was trying to get across.
            In retrospect, I should’ve handled it better and voiced my frustration more clearly and (much) less offensively. Sorry I blew up like that.
            Thank you for your understanding and consideration. You’re quite kind hearted & empathetic, and have restored some of the little faith I have left in humanity. You keep on being you, you’re wonderful.

            • Shampiss@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              7 months ago

              Great to know that you can recognize your imperfections. I’m sure you have a good character. And i’m glad you’re feeling better. Cheers!

      • mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Would you belive if I tell there are men problem even in “Male-dominant society”? In a male dominant society men are supposed to be dominant and they have pressures to do certain things. Also there are many cases in which women are given more previlages even in laws(atleast here), which makes no sense to distinguish people by sex in laws. You may argue its still due to male dominant culture we previously had but that is one of the men’s problem too. Just reminding

    • maynarkh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 months ago

      But you don’t understand, as a man you have absolutely no issues in today’s society that disproportionately affect your gender! Check your privilege! If a societal shortcoming affect men, it’s their own fault, since they made it this way! Negative gender stereotypes only hurt other groups, if it’s about men, they are actually helpful and move society forward!

      /s if it wasn’t obvious.

          • Rustmilian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            did you really need to come say “not all men” to a comment that didn’t even say “most?” Are you THAT insecure about the possibility that other men are unpleasant to women sometimes that you need to come and do this and keep replying and even draw pictures about it?

            You didn’t even read the argument. It’s not about “not all men” , it’s about your hyper-generalization and hypersimplification of men’s issues and acting like there’s a silver bullet solution that men are (implied) to lazy to do. Hence the “have they thought about smiling more” example, emphasizing the ridiculous copout response that solves nothing and actively hurts men. Which btw, is an actual IRL example.

            We can ignore the fact that you are currently being the man being unpleasant to women for the moment if it makes your continued trolling easier.

            You’re literally a woman hyper generalizing and oversimplifying men’s issues while being unpleasant to a man. Hypocrite.

    • Katrisia@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      The suicide rates have become one of the most popular arguments, which is a shame because it is incomplete. More men complete the suicidal act, but more women attempt it (apparently, they just own less guns, less substances in the garage, etc.). In other words—because I explain like sh*t in English: women are more suicidal, but less lethal in their attempts.

      Both sexes, and intersex people, suffer a lot. The various genders suffer a lot.

      I know influencers that talk about this problem without being Andrew Tate, but when I recommend them, I get downvoted as if they were worth nothing. I disagree. Of course, it is not a solution because life is always hard and confusing, but to listen to leftist men who understand feminism and other current social movements, and speak of the role of masculinity today considering those is very refreshing and it definitely helps and it is a step forward.

      In a nutshell, they talk about caring about mental health. Many of them already are through their own journeys via psychotherapy or other means of introspection and emotional awareness. They talk about feelings and beliefs within the people that were told that they need to be a cartoon, an action figure, because vulnerability is for the lesser sex and a real man™ despises those things. They talk about healing, understanding, cooperation, etc. I don’t know if you’re a leftist, but that’s behind other concepts such as anarchy or social welfare. It is nice to see the line of thought from healing the personal to healing the communal, and viceversa.

      So… yeah, ostracism is not the solution. It’s funny because I’ve suffered from agoraphobia and things like that in other moments of my life, and I understand the dysphoric feeling brought by just thinking about society. I have rejected society time and time again, but we are social creatures and we need each other.
      I need you because writing this comment is something that I feel I have to do. You’re giving me some minutes of purpose and even hope that I can make you feel less alone in this world. We both need the person that is making Lemmy possible, and our instances, and many other people on that chain. We like having friends and romantic relationships and random interactions on social media. We like going to events and activities in our towns or cities.

      As I see it, If society is not ‘rejectable’ without hurting ourselves and others, the next thing to do would be to interact healthily with our fellow human beings. It is an available journey, there are people willing to help in each step, but you need to trust and trust is hard as f*ck.

      • Rustmilian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        The focus was less on the suicide rates argument and more on the “have they tried smiling more?” response you’ll often hear from certain parties in an attempt to get across the insensitivity of the way OP presented men’s issues. I know I didn’t present that very clearly. Other than that, I agree with you.