• Pirasp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Because the deposit is tied to inflation. Older products might end up with way outdated deposits if you print the sum on the packaging, so it would have to be token based. The token is then inflation safe.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        It seems trivial to tie the token to a sale date. The future deposits on future purchases will keep pace with inflation because the deposits will increase, but you only get back the deposit you put in at time of purchase.

        Even if the deposit on bottles is $2 in 2035, if you bought when they were $1 they won’t accrue value by sitting in your garage.

        • Pirasp@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          And how exactly would you do that? One giant database of sales that everyone just has access to? Print it on the thing at time of sale? I can’t see any trivial solution, I’d be interested in yours tho!

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            I don’t see why everyone needs access, it could just be kept with the Department of Energy (or whoever would be in charge of the proposed universal deposit program). Accessing it would require a court order, just like digging through someone’s trash.

            Although that said, an open database of every single purchase would have all sorts of uses!

            For instance, if someone litters, the authorities could track the unique code to the purchase and then… well. 🙂

            • Pirasp@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              If you want to sell a product you would have to register that deposit in the database, similarly if you get it back you have to access the database to know how much to pay out. If you don’t want to limit selling products to large businesses everyone needs access.

              Sure, consequences for littering are fun and all, but the passive surveillance that allows is terrifying imho.

              • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                Do you think that kind of surveillance isn’t already happening with credit card companies, online shopping, and chain stores?

                • Pirasp@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Oh, no. I’m quite aware. The companies that can do it have a large enough effect in my life as it is. I really do not wish for scammers, random trolls, foreign government or home invader (tracking where you are based on purchases) to join them.

                  Right now I can make it hard for the big players by using the right tools and services. This would make it completely impossible.

                  • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 month ago

                    How the hell are scammers, random trolls, or foreign governments going to do that with a token that says the date when you bought something? Especially if the key to decrypt the token is held by the DoE!