“It seemed doomed almost from the moment they decided to go to a sealed bid,” Judge Lopez said. “Nobody knows what anybody else is bidding,” he added.

  • Aatube@kbin.melroy.orgOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 days ago

    Apparently they also did not allow follow-up bids/outbidding others. It’s called a bankruptcy auction for a reason.

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      ·
      4 days ago

      And there’s a trustee for a reason. The debtors decided that the value of keeping Alex Jones away from InfoWars had its own value and were willing to accept a lower bid. There’s no fiduciary duty to maximize the proceeds from the sale, and Alex buying back his own assets during a bankruptcy auction is actual fraud.

    • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      4 days ago

      A first price sealed bid auction is a perfectly common type of auction.
      It’s functionally equivalent to an auction where you know the value of a thing (like we do a business being liquidated because the owner is in extremely deep unrelated legal debt), and the auctioneer starts by asking for the face value and then progressively lowers the ask until the first person accepts the price.
      Instead of trying to get the lowest price possible, people are incentivised to start with their best offer for what they actually think the thing is valued. Allowing follow-up bids encourages people to low-ball and work their way up, which can reduce the price the seller gets for the item.

      https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/sealed-bid-auction.asp

        • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          4 days ago

          No idea, and not entirely sure why it matters. If your goal is to sell an asset and maximize proceeds, it’s a known and unsurprising strategy, particularly since it gives higher returns when there are few bidders.

          • Aatube@kbin.melroy.orgOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            I think it has quite a chance of mattering. There’s two choices here: the judge is incomptetent/compromised, or there’s a reason this makes sense within the bankruptcy context. I want to explore the latter first before I make any judgements.

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      The underlying reason for the bankruptcy is bigger than dollars. Avoiding selling infowars to some other conservative shitheads to continue the harassment of Sandy Hook victims is far more important than dollar signs.

    • dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      This was not a typical bankruptcy auction, and part of the trustee’s role was to ensure an outcome that was acceptable to those injured by Jones, eg the Sandy Hook families.