• OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Do you not also disagree with those tactics, given how spectacularly they’ve failed to amount to anything material?

    • Sybil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      no. I think they could have won 100 years ago and I think they could win tomorrow. I like the tactic. people can be inspired and it can happen in an instant.

      • brain_in_a_box@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I think they could have won 100 years ago

        And yet they didn’t

        and I think they could win tomorrow.

        And yet they won’t.

            • Sybil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              you don’t know the future anymore than I. you don’t know what the next revolution will look like or what would start it.

                • Sybil@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  do I want to bet that you don’t know the future? absolutely. here’s a proof.

                  knowledge is defined as a justified true belief.
                  you can't have evidence about the future because it hasn't happened.
                  truth claims about the future have no value because it hasn't happened.
                  there is no justification that can produce knowledge about the future.
                  
                  you don't know the future.
                  

                  qed

                  edit: oh fuck. I was supposed to bet something. how about a loaf of bread?