• Sybil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’m the authority on what I want. there’s no evidence that you could produce that would undercut my claim.

        • Sybil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          this is some equivocation. it’s an informal fallacy you might want to look up.

          • brain_in_a_box@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            it’s an informal fallacy you might want to look up.

            Oh my god, I did not consent to be exposed to this level of Reddit cringe either.

            And also no, it’s not equivocation.

            • Sybil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              it is. since you seem opposed to learning anywhere but Lemmy, I’ll help you out. equivocation is an informal fallacy where you use one word in a certain context with a particular meaning, and then you use the same word in a different context with a different meaning, and then you claim that they’re the same thing. The authority of the boot maker is different from the authority of the cop. The authority of the doctor is different from the authority of the insurance company.

              • brain_in_a_box@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                it is. since you seem opposed to learning anywhere but Lemmy, I’ll help you out. equivocation is an informal fallacy where you use one word in a certain context with a particular meaning, and then you use the same word in a different context with a different meaning, and then you claim that they’re the same thing.

                Oh my God, go back to Reddit you insufferable debate bro.