• Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    Correct, unless it’s for work that doesn’t require special qualifications then it’s usually a question of “out of those employees with very similar qualifications, is one of them part of an ethnic minority/a woman/someone with a handicap?”

    • Timecircleline@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I like your definition, but I would argue the question is less “are they an ethnic minority or woman?” And more “do they have likely have experiences and perspectives different from our existing team based on their demographic?” A homogenous team is more likely to share a blind spot or weakness. It’s why varied backgrounds, ages, and gender identities are helpful.

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Right, a white person joining a team that’s 100% non white would be considered an ethnic minority in this case.

        I understand your point but HR won’t do a background check to figure out if an Indian candidate comes from a socio-economic background that makes them closer to the rest of the well off engineers team already in place vs a white guy that might have been raised in a very poor household. That’s why it’s usually ethnic origin, gender, handicap and surface stuff like that.