• Hyundai is slowly backing away from the all-screen approach to interior design.
  • Hyundai Design North America Vice President Ha Hak-soo said that people “get stressed, annoyed and steamed when they want to control something in a pinch but are unable to do so.”
  • Wilzax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Hyundai is listening to what consumers want much more readily than other manufacturers, and their body designs strike an incredible balance between modern familiarity and retrofuturism. It’s almost exactly what I want from a new vehicle, other than the fact that they use all the same forced telemetry that other brands are using.

    They’re also offering a great spread of electric AND hybrid vehicles to satisfy consumers worried about charger availability as well as consumers worried about the impact of gasoline-powered vehicles.

    I won’t be surprised if they continue to increase their market share for a long time to come. If only privacy concerns were as common among the broader population as they seem to be here in the Fediverse, then maybe they might address those issues as well and be a no-brainer purchase.

    • jayandp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Pretty much. Give me a screen for Android Auto so I can interact with my preferred navigation and media apps, and then just let me control the car.

      Like, if you want to add a menu for low-level tweaking of stuff I don’t need(or shouldn’t change) while driving, sure(like suspension settings). But for everything else, AC, seat warmers, forward/reverse, windshield wipers, headlights, etc, I want a button or knob.

  • Godort@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    Good. This should be forced via regulations. Touchscreen controls are provably more dangerous than buttons due to the distraction.

    • Jesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m sure Trump and his new auto industry advisor, Elon Musk, will get right on that. 😔

    • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Haptic feedback like knob clicks or button presses are much easier to use without taking eyes off the road as often.

      • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Shhh, don’t call it “haptic feedback” or they might make them flat, unmoving buttons that have a vibration motor behind them.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Absolutely my creed. In my industrial niche, touch screen never took hold - when your action is actually (or at least perceived) important, nobody wants to rely on touch screens.

  • Th4tGuyII@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Honestly. I’d be fine with a touchscreen for things you wouldn’t likely be adjusting on the go anyways - but basic stuff like the radio and AC/Fans should always be easy to distinguish, don’t need to look away from the road to operate buttons. Making basic stuff require touchscreen is inconvenient at best and outright dangerous at worst.

  • Toes♀@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Not having touch anything is a selling point for me. Bonus points if I can roll up the window too.

    • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Personally I prefer a mixture of both. Touch screen for anything you don’t need to operate while driving and physical for everything else.

      Android Auto navigation, car system/audio settings, clock and system management, etc should all be a touch screen so you aren’t navigating through turning knobs and pressing up and down buttons to go through various menus like your programming a microwave.

      Knobs and dials and buttons for anything to do with audio volume, skip/reverse tracks, etc. and air conditioning.

    • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Automakers will read this comment and think that everyone wants voice control instead of touchscreens or buttons.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        My Prius has a voice control option built in already. The only time I’ve ever activated it is by accident because it’s a steering wheel button. It’s a 2016 Prius so I doubt it’s able to do a whole lot anyway. Thankfully, most of the controls do not require the touch screen or voice control. None of the essential ones do.

      • ziggurat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Please unlock the door

        Voice can not be authenticated please run calibration in the phone app

        Open the door

        Voice can not be authenticated please run calibration in the phone app

        Ooopen theeee dooooor

        Voice can not be authenticated please run calibration in the phone app

        Unlock the door

        Turning on cabin warmer

        The door unlock it

        Voice can not be authenticated please run calibration in the phone app

        Open the door!

        Voice can not be authenticated please run calibration in the phone app