• FriendBesto@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      That’s the point. But when Israel demands the Palestinians to be forcefully removed, they will exclaim that the pier can be used to have them ported out. To say, the EU or USA. Since removing them has always been the point. Thatich has been clear since the beginning of their invasion of Gaza, killing 35,000+ and herding them into that direction. The issue is if they will get away with it and the rest of the West will allow it. Or they will demand that Egypt takes them, which they won’t unless maybe they get we debt forgiven plus cash. Which I still doubt they will, Egypt is financially broke and has crazy debt anday not want to take millions of refugees.

      • logging_strict@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Can see the Egyptian POV.

        These refugees previously were politically destabilizing Egypt from within. They don’t want a repeat of that.

        The US is a 3rd party. If Israel deported them it would be a war crime. If the US accepts them onto that pier, it’s not.

        Solves Egypt and Israel mutual problem.

        The US could then push them into Canada. If anything bad happened there, it would be an improvement over the status quo.

  • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    6 months ago

    Every single headline about this aid distribution should just read “US still somehow taking orders from nation that only exists because of their support.”

    The idea that Isreal can block the US from just driving aid over the border is insane. The idea that Isreal can dictate any terms to the US is insane. If the US actually pulled all support, Isreal would be fucked, and they know it. But the US government keeps throwing up its hands and acting like Isreal has them over a barrel.

  • protist@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    6 months ago

    This article doesn’t say “but distribution blocked” anywhere, that is OP’s invention. They only started receiving shipments today. The article quotes a “US aid chief” as saying other land crossings and humanitarian corridors are still needed in addition to this pier.

    • filoria@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      6 months ago

      The Associated Press, however, quoted an unnamed UN official as saying distribution of the shipment had not begun as of Friday afternoon.

      The Guardian changes titles more frequently than you change underwear.

    • livus@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      It isn’t “OP’s invention” at all, it’s the article’s title at the time of first publication. Here is the Guardian announcing the article under its original title.

      Maybe spend 5 seconds on a basic search before you accuse people of stuff.

      Given that the article says the aid will still have to go through an Israeli checkpoint in order to be sent north (where the worst famine is) I will be amazed if the small amount of aid scheduled to come through this pier doesn’t suffer the same distribution blockages as other aid.

    • logging_strict@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      No problem. Dump them into Libyan slave markets.

      This will free up the pier for more able bodied workers, err i mean, refugees.

      Think about beauty of it. The Barbary Pirates of North Africa were targeting US trade during Thomas Jefferson term in office. Forcing the formation of the US Navy.

      The US can get back to being ol’ friends with them.

      And come back history wise full circle

  • ME5SENGER_24@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    6 months ago

    So if the Israelis block the aid their weapons packages should also be blocked, right? Not that the US should’ve given them in the first place, but if they’re not gonna let humanitarian aid in, then I guess we should just give the bombs to Palestine

    • logging_strict@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Lets repeat this a few hundred more times. A clock and a gold fish are going to have a better trading records than you can ever hope for.

      Any country the US sets up a pier near, will have no choice but to deal with the local government. In no universe, will that not be the case.

      If not, that pier is Israeli territory! They can land troops there and just say, Thank you!. And there is not much the US could do.

      So cooperation with Israel is key to making this precedent work. Might be quite the show watching the US try to do humble

      • ME5SENGER_24@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        You’re drunk right? You do realize all of Israel’s Conor McGregor-esque arm swinging is due to US support, right?

      • orcrist@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        “There is not much the US could do.” … I can think of several things the US could easily do that would screw over the Israeli military quickly enough. You can too, so I’m confused why you wrote this.

      • brain_in_a_box@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Any country the US sets up a pier near, will have no choice but to deal with the local government. In no universe, will that not be the case. If not, that pier is Israeli territory!

        Mmm yes, as we all know, the USA just can’t do anything in the Middle East without the approval of the local government, just ask Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, Iran, Syria, Lebanon and Yemen.

        Also pretty fucking interesting that you suddenly consider Gaza to be “Israeli territory”. So the people living there are Israeli citizens then?

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The White House national security spokesperson, John Kirby, confirmed on Friday that truckloads of humanitarian aid, including food from the United Arab Emirates, sent by ship from Cyprus, had been unloaded on the Gaza coast and handed over to the control of the UN.

    The head of the US Agency for International Development (USAid), Samantha Power, said the US would use the sea route to deliver “metric tons of life-saving aid, including nutrient rich food to support thousands of Gaza’s most vulnerable children and adults; and critical supplies such as plastic sheeting for shelter, jerry cans to hold clean water, and hygiene kits”.

    But, Power added: “The pier that opened today does not replace or substitute for land crossings into Gaza, every one of which needs to operate at maximum capacity and efficiency.

    Although the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) have yet to launch an attack on the centre of Rafah, the UN said on Friday that nearly 640,000 people had been displaced from the city, many of them going north to Deir al-Balah, where, it said, conditions were “dire”.

    The maritime route involves shipments of aid being inspected by Israel at the Cypriot port of Larnaca, then transported by large ships to a floating dock a few kilometres off the Gaza coast.

    The US national security adviser, Jake Sullivan, is expected to travel to Saudi Arabia on Saturday for talks with the crown prince, Mohammed bin Salman, followed by a stop in Israel for a meeting with the prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu.


    The original article contains 1,024 words, the summary contains 252 words. Saved 75%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • D61 [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I wonder how much of that pier was built using the rubble that nobody had time to dig the bodies out of before it was pushed into the water?