• kbal@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    For reasons unknown to me, AMD decided this year to discontinue funding the effort

    Presumably they did not want to see Cuda becoming the final de-facto standard that everyone uses. It nearly did at one point a couple of years ago, despite the lack of openness and lack of AMD hardware support.

    • RandomLegend@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      i heavily rely on CUDA for many things i do on my personal computer. If this establishes itself as a reliable method to use all the funky CUDA stuff on AMD cards, my next card will 100% be AMD.

    • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      i heavily rely on CUDA for many things i do on my personal computer. If this establishes itself as a reliable method to use all the funky CUDA stuff on AMD cards, my next card will 100% be AMD.

      If there were a drop in equivalent to CUDA with AMD, I’d have several AMD cards, right now.

      • Atemu@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        By funding an API-compatible product, they are giving CUDA legitimacy as a common API. I can absolutely understand AMD not wanting a competitors invention and walled-off product to be anything resembling an industry standard.

      • kbal@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        That is contradicted by the headline. This easy confusion between CUDA (the API) and CUDA (the proprietary software package that is one implementation of it) illustrates the problem with CUDA.

        ZLUDA seems to be an effort to fix that problem, but I don’t know what it’s chances of success might be.

        • verdigris@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          It’s just a bad headline. They funded a CUDA replacement, then stopped funding it, as a result of which the project was released as open source.

  • ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    All I need to know about AMD is this:

    Whenever amdgpu.ko is insmoded, the display (or the system itself in some cases) is unstable. When it works great now, one day it won’t and the machine will inexplicably start crashing randomly or displaying garbage after an update.

    This has held true for years for me on many machines I’ve installed Linux on, and it still does: not a week ago, I updated a laptop with a Renoir chipset in it (RX Vega 6) that had been stable for years, and now the display gets corrupted whenever I switch VT. Because amdgpu…

    Not bashing on AMD or Nvidia. This has just been my reality. As a result, whenever I have a choice, I go with Intel graphics because it never causes me as much of a headache.