no. I think they could have won 100 years ago and I think they could win tomorrow. I like the tactic. people can be inspired and it can happen in an instant.
do I want to bet that you don’t know the future? absolutely. here’s a proof.
knowledge is defined as a justified true belief.
you can't have evidence about the future because it hasn't happened.
truth claims about the future have no value because it hasn't happened.
there is no justification that can produce knowledge about the future.
you don't know the future.
qed
edit: oh fuck. I was supposed to bet something. how about a loaf of bread?
I know you disagree with anarchist tactics. That’s what our whole discussion is about.
Do you not also disagree with those tactics, given how spectacularly they’ve failed to amount to anything material?
no. I think they could have won 100 years ago and I think they could win tomorrow. I like the tactic. people can be inspired and it can happen in an instant.
And yet they didn’t
And yet they won’t.
this is just posturing.
“acknowledgeing material reality is posturing”
Man, your while ideology is just posturing.
you don’t know the future anymore than I. you don’t know what the next revolution will look like or what would start it.
Want to bet on it?
Not everyone has completely abandoned the idea of material reality the way you have.
do I want to bet that you don’t know the future? absolutely. here’s a proof.
qed
edit: oh fuck. I was supposed to bet something. how about a loaf of bread?